Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 15;15(5):e093581.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093581.

Determining the key elements of community-based care for women and partners following a stillbirth or second trimester miscarriage: protocol for a realist synthesis

Becky MacGregor  1 , Helen Leach  2 , Rachel Court  3 , Amy Grove  3 , Alexander Edward Heazell  4 , Sarah Hillman  5 , Sophie Staniszewska  2
Affiliations

Determining the key elements of community-based care for women and partners following a stillbirth or second trimester miscarriage: protocol for a realist synthesis

Becky MacGregor et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Stillbirth and second trimester miscarriage have wide-reaching consequences for women, their partners and their families. There is currently little community-based care provision within the National Health Service for women and partners who have had a stillbirth or second trimester miscarriage. There is a research gap in the evidence to guide best practice. This review will seek to understand how, when and where this care is best delivered.

Methods and analysis: The aim of this review is to identify the key elements of community-based care following a stillbirth or second trimester miscarriage. As this is a complex intervention, a realist approach will be used to establish for whom, how, when and where this care is best delivered. An initial programme theory will be constructed which will be tested against the available evidence and refined. A wide range of evidence including qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods and experiential knowledge will be identified through secondary sources, extracted and synthesised to develop and refine the programme theory.

Ethics and dissemination: This review will not require ethical approval as it does not involve primary data collection. The findings will be submitted for open-access publication to a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated to stakeholders.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024587365.

Keywords: Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Primary Health Care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the review process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Heazell AEP, Siassakos D, Blencowe H, et al. Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences. The Lancet. 2016;387:604–16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00836-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith LK, Dickens J, Bender Atik R, et al. Parents’ experiences of care following the loss of a baby at the margins between miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death: a UK qualitative study. BJOG. 2020;127:868–74. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16113. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shakespeare C, Merriel A, Bakhbakhi D, et al. The RESPECT Study for consensus on global bereavement care after stillbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;149:137–47. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13110. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heazell AEP, Whitworth MK, Whitcombe J, et al. Research priorities for stillbirth: process overview and results from UK Stillbirth Priority Setting Partnership. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:641–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.15738. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Draper ES, Gallimore ID, Smith LK, et al. Leicester: The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester; 2023. MBRRACE-UK perinatal mortality surveillance, UK perinatal deaths for births from January to December 2021: state of the nation report.