Application of diagnostic criteria in paediatric complex regional pain syndrome: a scoping review protocol
- PMID: 40379330
- PMCID: PMC12086909
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101963
Application of diagnostic criteria in paediatric complex regional pain syndrome: a scoping review protocol
Abstract
Introduction: There are no validated paediatric-specific diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). As a result, diagnostic tools developed for adults (eg, Budapest Criteria, Japanese Diagnostic Criteria, Veldman Criteria) are frequently applied in the paediatric population. However, the clinical presentations and trajectories of children can differ from adults. Given that treatment outcomes are linked to early diagnosis and intervention, the lack of paediatric-specific screening or diagnostic tools is an important knowledge gap. We aim to identify the frequency of individual criteria used in diagnosing CRPS in children and adolescents in existing literature, summarise assessment methods used to establish the diagnosis, and provide recommendations for research and clinical application.
Methods: The following databases and platforms will be searched for articles published from 2003 (year the Budapest Criteria was developed) onward: CINAHL, CENTRAL, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Our search strategy will use subject headings and text words related to the concepts of CRPS in paediatric populations, with study inclusion criteria from birth up to 18 years old, and a diagnosis of CRPS. Data will be extracted by our multidisciplinary team and findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.
Ethics and dissemination: This study does not involve human participants or unpublished data; therefore, approval from a human research ethics committee is not required. The findings of this scoping review will be disseminated through academic conferences and peer-reviewed publications.
Keywords: Adolescent; Child; Chronic Pain.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Screening and diagnostic tools for complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review.Pain. 2021 May 1;162(5):1295-1304. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002146. Pain. 2021. PMID: 33230004 Free PMC article.
-
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024. Wellcome Open Res. 2024. PMID: 39839977 Free PMC article.
-
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37024251 Free PMC article.
-
Management of complex regional pain syndrome in trauma and orthopaedic surgery-a systematic review.Br Med Bull. 2023 Jun 21;146(1):27-42. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldac034. Br Med Bull. 2023. PMID: 37185896
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous