Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 15;15(5):e091956.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091956.

Effect of a smart ring-assisted physiotherapeutic intervention on the postoperative outcomes 12 months after a total knee replacement (SmarTKRing): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations

Effect of a smart ring-assisted physiotherapeutic intervention on the postoperative outcomes 12 months after a total knee replacement (SmarTKRing): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Joni Hautala et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: This protocol assesses the effect of a wearable activity tracker-assisted physiotherapeutic intervention on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Despite advancements in TKR technology, patient dissatisfaction remains a concern, with adherence to physical activity guidelines being particularly poor among those with knee osteoarthritis. The primary aim of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a smart ring-assisted physiotherapeutic intervention in improving outcomes, as measured by the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), 12 months after a TKR.

Methods and analysis: We are conducting this randomised controlled trial at Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement in Finland, where participants are randomly assigned to either an intervention with smart ring-supported physiotherapeutic intervention or a usual care control group in a 1:1 ratio in patients undergoing TKR surgery. The primary outcome measure is the OKS at 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes encompass OKS variance, poor postoperative outcome (defined as ≤7 points change on the OKS), quality of life questionnaire EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels(EQ-5D-5L), knee range of motion, pain scores, patient satisfaction and healthcare resource utilisation. The study population comprises patients aged 18-70 undergoing unilateral primary TKR for knee osteoarthritis. Statistical analysis involves logistic regression and linear mixed models to assess group differences in outcomes over time, with adjustments for relevant covariates.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial was approved by the Tampere University Hospital Ethical Committee (R22078) and participants are required to provide written informed consent. Procedures in conducting the trial are aligned with the principles of Good Scientific Practice outlined by the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. The results of this trial will be disseminated as a series of articles published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.

Trial registration number: NCT05599776.

Keywords: Knee; ORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERY; Orthopedics; Patients; Randomized Controlled Trial; Wearable Electronic Devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow chart illustrating the timing of recruitment, allocation and intervention delivery. This flow chart outlines the study process from recruitment through intervention delivery. Participants are assessed for eligibility. Those eligible provide consent and undergo baseline data collection during an outpatient clinic visit. Following randomisation, participants are allocated to either the intervention or control group. Both groups experience a waiting period before surgery, after which intervention and postoperative data collection occur. The structured approach ensures clear delineation of participant flow and study methodology.

References

    1. Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F, et al. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:963–74. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Räsänen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H, et al. Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:108–15. doi: 10.1080/17453670610013501. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012;379:1331–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Skou ST, Roos EM, Laursen MB, et al. Total knee replacement and non-surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis: 2-year outcome from two parallel randomized controlled trials. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018;26:1170–80. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.04.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bone & Joint Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement. [21-Apr-2024]. https://boneandjoint.org.uk/Article/10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24394 Available. Accessed. - DOI

Publication types

Associated data