Diagnosis and assessment of subtle Lisfranc injuries: Comparison of computed tomography and weight-bearing radiography
- PMID: 40379546
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2025.04.004
Diagnosis and assessment of subtle Lisfranc injuries: Comparison of computed tomography and weight-bearing radiography
Abstract
Background: Subtle Lisfranc injuries cause instability around the Lisfranc joint, leading to loss of foot function without appropriate treatment. The diagnostic accuracy of the commonly used Nunley classification, which is based on weight-bearing radiographs, is controversial. We compared the Nunley classification and computed tomography (CT) findings for subtle Lisfranc injury severity.
Methods: Fifty-one patients diagnosed with subtle Lisfranc injury were retrospectively enrolled. After excluding those without weight-bearing radiography or CT images, the medical histories, weight-bearing radiographs, and CT images of 33 patients were reviewed. We measured the distance between the proximal first and second metatarsals from the anteroposterior radiographs and that between the plantar aspect of the first cuneiform and plantar aspect of the fifth metatarsals from the lateral view and then classified the cases according to the Nunley classification. CT images were evaluated for avulsion fragments at the Lisfranc ligament complex attachment sites.
Results: According to the Nunley classification, seven patients were stage I, 23 were stage II, and three were stage III. Based on weight-bearing radiographs, the C1-M5 distance was 1.29 ± 0.40 cm/1.01 ± 0.36 cm (injured feet/contralateral feet; p < 0.05) overall. On CT images, the avulsion bone fragment location revealed one case of interosseous Lisfranc ligament and five cases of plantar capsular Lisfranc ligament complex in Nunley stage I. In Nunley stage II, three patients had a dorsal capsular Lisfranc ligament complex, 15 had an interosseous Lisfranc ligament, and 18 had a plantar capsular Lisfranc ligament complex. In Nunley stage III, two patients had interosseous Lisfranc ligaments, and three patients had a plantar capsular Lisfranc ligament complex.
Conclusions: Patients in the acute phase of subtle Lisfranc injury did not place weight on their injured foot. In 93.9 % of subtle Lisfranc injury cases, avulsion fragments were present at the ligament attachment site, and severity was different from weight-bearing radiographs.
Keywords: Avulsion fracture; Computed tomography; Severity; Subtle Lisfranc injury; Weight-bearing radiographs.
Copyright © 2025 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest None.
Similar articles
-
Lisfranc joint displacement following sequential ligament sectioning.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Oct;89(10):2225-32. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00958. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007. PMID: 17908900
-
Weightbearing Computed Tomography Can Accurately Detect Subtle Lisfranc Injury.Foot Ankle Int. 2024 Oct;45(10):1145-1155. doi: 10.1177/10711007241266844. Epub 2024 Jul 30. Foot Ankle Int. 2024. PMID: 39080976
-
Asymmetric lambda sign of the second tarsometatarsal joint on axial weight-bearing cone-beam CT scans of the foot: preliminary investigation for diagnosis of subtle ligamentous Lisfranc injuries in a cadaveric model.Skeletal Radiol. 2020 Oct;49(10):1615-1621. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03445-5. Epub 2020 May 11. Skeletal Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32394072
-
Imaging in Lisfranc injury: a systematic literature review.Skeletal Radiol. 2020 Jan;49(1):31-53. doi: 10.1007/s00256-019-03282-1. Epub 2019 Jul 31. Skeletal Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31368007
-
Lisfranc Injury Imaging and Surgical Management.Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2016 Apr;20(2):139-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1581119. Epub 2016 Jun 23. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27336449 Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources