A comprehensive review of 20 years of progress in nonclinical QT evaluation and proarrhythmic assessment

Abstract

The assessment of drug-induced QT interval prolongation and associated proarrhythmic risks, such as Torsades de Pointes (TdP), has evolved significantly over the past decades. This review traces the development of nonclinical QT evaluation, highlighting key milestones and innovations that have shaped current practices in cardiac safety assessment. The emergence of regulatory guidelines, including International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) S7B, established a nonclinical framework for evaluating drug effects on cardiac repolarization, addressing concerns raised by drug withdrawals in the 1990s. Advances in in vitro, in vivo, and in silico models have enhanced the predictive accuracy of nonclinical studies, with the hERG assay and telemetry-based animal models becoming gold standards. Recent initiatives, such as the Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) and the Japan iPS Cardiac Safety Assessment (JiCSA), emphasize integrating mechanistic insights from human-derived cardiomyocyte models and computational approaches to refine risk predictions. The 2020s mark a shift toward integrated nonclinical-clinical risk assessments, as exemplified by the ICH E14/S7B Questions and Answers. These highlight the need of best practices for study design, data analysis, and interpretation to support regulatory decision-making. Furthermore, the adoption of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) and reinforced adherence to 3Rs principles (Reduce, Refine, Replace) reflect a commitment to ethical and innovative safety science. This review underscores the importance of harmonized and translational approaches in cardiac safety evaluation, providing a foundation for advancing drug development while safeguarding patient safety. Future directions include further integration of advanced methodologies and regulatory harmonization to streamline nonclinical and clinical risk assessments.

Keywords: Cardiac safety; Integrated risk assessment; Nonclinical; QT evaluation; Regulatory guidance.