Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 16;15(1):17100.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01962-8.

A cross-sectional online survey on oncologists' attitudes toward and experiences with providing patients with audio recordings of their medical encounters

Cheyenne Topf  1 , Pola Hahlweg #  2 , Isabelle Scholl #  2
Affiliations

A cross-sectional online survey on oncologists' attitudes toward and experiences with providing patients with audio recordings of their medical encounters

Cheyenne Topf et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Providing patients with audio recordings of their medical encounters, termed consultation recordings, has shown promising benefits, especially for patients with cancer. While patients favor these recordings, international research indicated that physicians have mixed feelings. To date, research specific to Germany remains limited. This study investigated German oncologists' attitudes and experiences through a nationwide cross-sectional quantitative online survey, informed by semi-structured interviews. Attitudes, prior experiences and desire for consultation recordings were assessed. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and subgroup analyses. Ninety-four physicians participated, with about half expressing a generally positive attitude, though overall attitudes were mixed. Expected benefits included improved patient recall and communication, while concerns centered around potential misuse of recordings, data confidentiality, and increased legal risks. Experiences were limited, with 12% reporting previous use. Fourteen percent expressed a willingness to offer recordings in future and 31% were undecided. This study highlights cautious openness among German oncologists, tempered by concerns over data security and legal implications, which may hinder adoption. This could be addressed by providing sound evidence regarding benefits and concerns, and enabling positive experiences. Further research should include feasibility testing in routine cancer care and re-evaluation of these results in representative samples and other specialties.

Keywords: Consultation recordings; Cross; Cross-sectional online study; Oncology; Patient information; Patient-centered care; Patient–physician-relationship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: CT declares no conflict of interest. PH and IS declare that they have been members of the executive board of the International Shared Decision Making Society, which has the mission to foster SDM implementation. PH and IS have no further competing interests. Ethics statement: This study was carried out according to the latest version of the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association. The study was approved by the Psychological Ethics Committee of the Center for Psychosocial Medicine of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (LPEK-0406). Standards of research ethics were met. Participants provided digital written informed consent to participate in this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant inclusion.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Attitude toward the provision of audio recordings of medical encounters for patients.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Matsuyama, R. K., Kuhn, L. A., Molisani, A. & Wilson-Genderson, M. C. Cancer patients’ information needs the first nine months after diagnosis. Patient Educ. Couns.90, 96–102 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Tsulukidze, M., Durand, M. A., Barr, P. J., Mead, T. & Elwyn, G. Providing recording of clinical consultation to patients – a highly valued but underutilized intervention: A scoping review. Patient Educ. Couns.95, 297–304 (2014). - PubMed
    1. Kessels, R. P. C. Patients’ memory for medical information. J. R. Soc. Med.96, 219–222 (2003). - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Meulen, N., Jansen, J., van Dulmen, S., Bensing, J. & van Weert, J. Interventions to improve recall of medical information in cancer patients: A systematic review of the literature. Psycho-Oncol.17, 857–868 (2008). - PubMed
    1. Sherlock, A. & Brownie, S. Patients’ recollection and understanding of informed consent: A literature review. ANZ J. Surg.84, 207–210 (2014). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources