Optimum electrical impedance tomography-based PEEP and recruitment-to-inflation ratio in patients with severe ARDS on venovenous ECMO
- PMID: 40380232
- PMCID: PMC12084998
- DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05437-0
Optimum electrical impedance tomography-based PEEP and recruitment-to-inflation ratio in patients with severe ARDS on venovenous ECMO
Abstract
Rationale: The significance of the Recruitment to Inflation (R/I) ratio in identifying PEEP recruiters in patients undergoing ultra-protective lung ventilation during venovenous ECMO is not well established.
Objectives: To compare the concordance of the R/I ratio and Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) in determining optimum PEEP settings in severe ARDS patients on ECMO and ventilated with very low tidal volumes.
Methods: Initially, a low-flow insufflation was performed to detect and measure the airway opening pressure (AOP). Subsequently, the R/I ratio was calculated from PEEP 15-5 cmH2O, followed by a decremental PEEP trial (20-6 cmH2O in 2 cmH2O steps) monitored by EIT. The optimum EIT-based PEEP was defined as the intersection of the collapse and overdistension curves.
Main results: Among 54 ECMO patients (tidal volume: 4.8 [3.0-6.0] mL/kg), 13 (24%) exhibited an airway opening pressure (AOP) of 11 (8-14) cmH2O. The cohort's median R/I ratio was 0.43 (0.28-0.61). A tertile-based analysis of the R/I ratio (≤ 0.34; 0.34-0.54; > 0.54) revealed median optimum EIT-based PEEP of 8 [8-10], 10 [8-14], and 14 [12-16] cmH2O, respectively. The R/I ratio demonstrated weak inverse correlations with lung overdistension (R2 = 0.19) and positive correlations with lung collapse (R2 = 0.26) measured by EIT (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: The R/I ratio is feasible during ultra-protective ventilation and provides valuable indications for guiding PEEP titration. Specifically, an R/I ratio > 0.34 may help identify patients likely to benefit from further individualized PEEP optimization using EIT. In contrast, when the R/I ratio is ≤ 0.34, a moderate PEEP level (8-10 cmH₂O) may suffice.
Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Electrical impedance tomography; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Recruitment-to-inflation ratio.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethics approval was obtained from the appropriate legal and ethical authorities (CPP 2022-A02589-34). According to local legislation, signed informed consent was waived as the study reports data routinely acquired in usual care. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: Alain Combes reports grants from Getinge, and personal fees from Getinge, Baxter, and Xenios outside the submitted work. Matthieu Schmidt reports lecture fees from Getinge, Dräger, Baxter, and Fresenius Medical Care outside the submitted work. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures



References
-
- Brodie D, Slutsky AS, Combes A. Extracorporeal life support for adults with respiratory failure and related indications: a review. JAMA. 2019;322:557. - PubMed
-
- Serpa Neto A, Schmidt M, Azevedo LCP, Bein T, Brochard L, et al. Associations between ventilator settings during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory hypoxemia and outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pooled individual patient data analysis: mechanical ventilation during ECMO. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1672–84. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Franchineau G, Bréchot N, Lebreton G, Hekimian G, Nieszkowska A, Trouillet J-L, et al. Bedside contribution of electrical impedance tomography to setting positive end-expiratory pressure for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–treated patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:447–57. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources