Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 16;23(1):49.
doi: 10.1186/s12959-025-00735-7.

Association of initial national early warning score with clinical deterioration in pulmonary embolism

Affiliations

Association of initial national early warning score with clinical deterioration in pulmonary embolism

Anthony J Weekes et al. Thromb J. .

Abstract

Background: The National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) predicts clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients. Its role in pulmonary embolism (PE) risk stratification remains underexplored. This study assessed the association of initial NEWS2 with clinical deterioration and advanced interventions during hospitalization.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a PE response team (PERT) registry of adults with submassive and massive PE from 11 emergency departments (2016-2024). Initial NEWS2 was calculated for each registry patient. The primary outcome was in-hospital PE-related clinical deterioration (death, cardiac arrest, vasoactive medications for hypotension, or emergent respiratory interventions). The secondary outcome was advanced intervention use. We calculated odds ratios (OR) for different NEWS2 cut-offs. We used multivariable analysis to assess the association of NEWS2 and study outcomes, and decision curve analysis to determine net benefit of clinical deterioration.

Results: Among 2119 patients (mean age 62.2 [16.8], 51.2% female, 168 [7.9%] with massive PE, and 1951 [92.1%] with submassive PE), 309 patients (14.6%) experienced clinical deterioration and 488 (23.0%) required advanced interventions. Mean NEWS2 was higher in patients with vs. without clinical deterioration (6.0 ± 3.3 vs. 3.0 ± 2.4; p < 0.001) and in those with vs. without advanced interventions (4.8 ± 3.1 vs. 3.0 ± 2.5; p < 0.001). NEWS2 cut-off of ≥ 3 identified patients at risk of clinical deterioration: sensitivity 87% (82-90%), OR 6.1 (95% CI: 4.3-8.5), and negative predictive value (NPV) 96% (94-97%). NEWS2 cut-off ≥ 4 had specificity of 62% (60-65%), OR of 5.1 (95% CI: 3.9-6.7), and NPV of 94% (92-95%). As a continuous variable, NEWS2 had an OR of 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1-1.3). NEWS2 cut-offs from 3 to 5 showed an improved net benefit (0.08, 0.16, and 0.34) compared with treating all patients as high risk for clinical deterioration.

Conclusion: Patients with PE and initial NEWS2 scores ≥ 3 had a four-fold to eight-fold higher odds of clinical deterioration than those with NEWS2 < 3. NEWS2 is useful for predicting clinical deterioration and guiding intervention strategies in PE.

Keywords: Adverse events; Clinical deterioration; Early warning scores; Intervention; Mortality; National early warning score; Outcomes; Pulmonary embolism; Risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: We extracted data for patients entered into the Clinical Outcomes in Pulmonary Embolism Research Registry. The registry and observational studies using its data (including this study) were approved by the Advocate Health– Wake Forest University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board with a waiver of informed consent (IRB Study #IRB00082657). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram Primary outcome: Subsequent in-hospital clinical deterioration Secondary outcome: Advanced PE intervention Abbreviations: PE = pulmonary embolism, PERT = pulmonary embolism response team
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Predicted versus actual clinical deterioration at NEWS2 cut-offs
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Net benefit decision curve for clinical deterioration
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Predicted high-risk by true positive for each NEWS2 cut-off
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Sensitivity versus true positive: false positive ratio plot of NEWS2 cut-offs for clinical deterioration

References

    1. Royal College of Physicians. National early warning score (NEWS) 2: standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Updated report of a working party. London: RCP; 2017.
    1. Freund Y, Lemachatti N, Krastinova E, Van Laer M, Claessens Y-E, Avondo A et al. Prognostic accuracy of sepsis-3 criteria for in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department. JAMA [Internet]. 2017;317:301–8. Available from: 10.1001/jama.2016.20329 - PubMed
    1. Keep JW, Messmer AS, Sladden R, Burrell N, Pinate R, Tunnicliff M et al. National early warning score at Emergency Department triage may allow earlier identification of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective observational study. Emerg Med J [Internet]. 2016;33:37–41. Available from: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204465 - PubMed
    1. Kaukonen K-M, Bailey M, Pilcher D, Cooper DJ, Bellomo R. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2015;372:1629–38. Available from: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415236 - PubMed
    1. Hodgson LE, Dimitrov BD, Congleton J, Venn R, Forni LG, Roderick PJ. A validation of the National Early Warning Score to predict outcome in patients with COPD exacerbation. Thorax [Internet]. 2017;72:23–30. Available from: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208436 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources