Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Aug;35(6-7):102907.
doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102907. Epub 2025 May 15.

Concordance with radical prostatectomy specimen of in-bore MRI-guided transperineal vs US-guided transrectal prostate biopsies: A propensity score matched analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Concordance with radical prostatectomy specimen of in-bore MRI-guided transperineal vs US-guided transrectal prostate biopsies: A propensity score matched analysis

Baptiste Poussot et al. Fr J Urol. 2025 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to examine the overall concordance of in-bore MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsies (mriTP-PB) with ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsies (usTR-PB) to the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen.

Patients and methods: Three hundred twenty-four patients who underwent RP after mriTP-PB (25 patients) and usTR-PB (299 patients) were included in this retrospective single-center study from 2016 to 2024. To ensure comparability between the groups, we performed a 1:2 propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was overall concordance between mriTP- and usTR-PB compared with RP. The secondary endpoints were upgrading, downgrading and prediction of focal treatment between mriTP- and usTR-PB.

Results: After matching patients, the median age of patients was 61.44 years in the mriTP-PB group and 60.94 years in the usTR-PB group (P=0.731). Overall concordance were better in the mriTP-PB group than in the usTR-PB group (44.0% vs. 19.15% respectively, P=0.031). Pathological concordance, upgrading and downgrading rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups. The sensibility and the specificity for prediction to focal treatment of PCa was 100% and 85% respectively in the mriTP-PB group, and 100% and 75% in the usTR-PB group. The PPV and the NPV was 62.5% and 100% respectively in the mriTP-PB group, and 41.2% and 100% in the usTR-PB group.

Conclusion: In-bore mriTP-PB appear to be more efficient than usTR-PB in the diagnostic strategy for PCa, enabling better selection of patients for focal treatment. Nevertheless, prospective studies with a larger number of patients included will be needed to confirm our results.

Level of evidence: 1a, strength rating : Strong.

Keywords: Biopsies transpérinéales; Biopsies transrectales; Concordance; Focal therapy; Prostatectomie; Prostatectomy; Thérapie focale; Transperineal biopsy; Transrectal biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of interest The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources