Concordance with radical prostatectomy specimen of in-bore MRI-guided transperineal vs US-guided transrectal prostate biopsies: A propensity score matched analysis
- PMID: 40381847
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102907
Concordance with radical prostatectomy specimen of in-bore MRI-guided transperineal vs US-guided transrectal prostate biopsies: A propensity score matched analysis
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was to examine the overall concordance of in-bore MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsies (mriTP-PB) with ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsies (usTR-PB) to the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen.
Patients and methods: Three hundred twenty-four patients who underwent RP after mriTP-PB (25 patients) and usTR-PB (299 patients) were included in this retrospective single-center study from 2016 to 2024. To ensure comparability between the groups, we performed a 1:2 propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was overall concordance between mriTP- and usTR-PB compared with RP. The secondary endpoints were upgrading, downgrading and prediction of focal treatment between mriTP- and usTR-PB.
Results: After matching patients, the median age of patients was 61.44 years in the mriTP-PB group and 60.94 years in the usTR-PB group (P=0.731). Overall concordance were better in the mriTP-PB group than in the usTR-PB group (44.0% vs. 19.15% respectively, P=0.031). Pathological concordance, upgrading and downgrading rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups. The sensibility and the specificity for prediction to focal treatment of PCa was 100% and 85% respectively in the mriTP-PB group, and 100% and 75% in the usTR-PB group. The PPV and the NPV was 62.5% and 100% respectively in the mriTP-PB group, and 41.2% and 100% in the usTR-PB group.
Conclusion: In-bore mriTP-PB appear to be more efficient than usTR-PB in the diagnostic strategy for PCa, enabling better selection of patients for focal treatment. Nevertheless, prospective studies with a larger number of patients included will be needed to confirm our results.
Level of evidence: 1a, strength rating : Strong.
Keywords: Biopsies transpérinéales; Biopsies transrectales; Concordance; Focal therapy; Prostatectomie; Prostatectomy; Thérapie focale; Transperineal biopsy; Transrectal biopsy.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure of interest The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials