Identifying Risk Factors for Myocardial Injury in Elderly Patients with Sepsis
- PMID: 40382677
- PMCID: PMC12101096
- DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947840
Identifying Risk Factors for Myocardial Injury in Elderly Patients with Sepsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myocardial injury is a common complication in elderly patients with sepsis and is associated with poor prognosis. This study aimed to identify clinical characteristics and independent risk factors for myocardial injury in elderly sepsis patients admitted to the Emergency Intensive Care Unit (EICU). MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 160 elderly patients with sepsis admitted to the EICU, categorized into myocardial injury and non-myocardial injury groups. Demographic data, inflammatory markers, echocardiographic parameters, and blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio (BAR) values were compared. Logistic regression identified independent risk factors, and ROC curve analysis assessed the predictive value of BAR. RESULTS Of 160 patients, 106 (63.1%) had myocardial injury, with an average age of 77.56±7.49 years. Myocardial injury was associated with lower ejection fraction (EF), and elevated procalcitonin, lactate, and BAR levels (P<0.05). Logistic regression identified septic shock (RR=2.612, P=0.003), elevated BAR (RR=2.272, P=0.035) and lactate levels (RR=1.145, P=0.010) as independent risk factors for myocardial injury. In contrast, increased EF (RR=0.932, P=0.007) was identified as protective against myocardial injury, with lower EF associated with a higher risk. ROC analysis showed that BAR had moderate predictive value (AUC=0.653, P<0.01), with sensitivity of 76.4% and specificity of 53.2% at an optimal cutoff of 0.33. CONCLUSIONS Septic shock, reduced EF, and elevated BAR and lactate levels are independent risk factors for myocardial injury in elderly patients with sepsis. BAR serves as an early marker for myocardial injury, aiding in risk assessment and management in the EICU.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Clinical features and prognostic factors in elderly patients with sepsis in the emergency intensive care unit.Hum Immunol. 2024 Nov;85(6):111092. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.111092. Epub 2024 Sep 9. Hum Immunol. 2024. PMID: 39255559
-
High Serum sTREM-1 Correlates With Myocardial Dysfunction and Predicts Prognosis in Septic Patients.Am J Med Sci. 2016 Jun;351(6):555-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.01.023. Epub 2016 Mar 5. Am J Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27238916
-
[The value of coagulation indicators combined with sequential organ failure assessment in assessing disease severity and prognosis of elderly patients with sepsis].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Nov;36(11):1133-1139. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240424-00374. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024. PMID: 39697016 Chinese.
-
Risk factors and outcomes of sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction and stress-induced cardiomyopathy in sepsis or septic shock: A comparative retrospective study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0263. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010263. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 29595686 Free PMC article.
-
[Predictive value of plasma heparin-binding protein combined with albumin for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Dec;36(12):1233-1237. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240718-00614. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024. PMID: 39780664 Chinese.
References
-
- Reinhart K, Daniels R, Kissoon N, et al. Recognizing sepsis as a global health priority – a WHO resolution. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(5):414–17. - PubMed
-
- Perner A, Cecconi M, Cronhjort M, et al. Expert statement for the management of hypovolemia in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(6):791–98. - PubMed
-
- Prescott HC, Angus DC. Postsepsis morbidity. JAMA. 2018;319(1):91. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical