Corneal microstructural changes, and nephropathy, in participants with diabetes mellitus with and without peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 40383529
- DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2025.2499601
Corneal microstructural changes, and nephropathy, in participants with diabetes mellitus with and without peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
The aim of this review is to evaluate corneal microstructural changes and nephropathy in participants with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN+) and without (DPN-) in each of type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). A systematic review of primary studies was conducted that quantified corneal sub-basal nerve plexus parameters using laser scanning in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) and DPN+ in at least five humans with diabetes mellitus. CCM parameters examined were corneal nerve fibre density (NFD), nerve branch density (NBD) and nerve fibre length (NFL). Weighted mean difference (±standard error) is reported. Twenty-six studies were included in this meta-analysis (18 for T1DM, 14 for T2DM). This comprised 1,357 participants with T1DM (573,784; DPN+, DPN-), 1,119 with T2DM (598,521; DPN+, DPN-) and 1,032 non-diabetic controls. Compared to T2DM, T1DM participants had larger differences in NFD (8.54 ± 0.83 vs 3.61 ± 0.41), NBD (11.92 ± 1.93 vs 3.56 ± 1.03) and NFL (4.24 ± 0.41 vs 1.65 ± 0.18) between DPN+ and DPN- groups. T1DM participants also had larger differences than T2DM participants in NBD (-21.26 ± 2.90 vs -6.15 ± 1.69) and NFL (-4.25 ± 0.59 vs -2.65 ± 0.31) between DPN- and non-diabetic controls, but smaller, insignificant difference, in NFD (-5.93 ± 0.90 vs -6.39 ± 0.92). eGFR was significantly different between DPN+ and DPN- in T1DM (p < 0.00001) but not in T2DM (p = 0.46). When comparing DPN- to DPN+, ACR was reduced in T1DM (-2.72 ± 1.14) and T2DM (-20.85 ± 8.91). Corneal sub-basal nerve changes and glomerular nephropathy likely precede peripheral neuropathy in T1DM and T2DM, with greater corneal neuropathy in T1DM. The current evidence suggests that CCM may be useful for monitoring the progression of diabetic neuropathy and nephropathy.
Keywords: Corneal neuropathy; diabetes; in vivo confocal microscopy; nephropathy.
Similar articles
-
Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Diabetes Investig. 2022 Jan;13(1):134-147. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13643. Epub 2021 Aug 27. J Diabetes Investig. 2022. PMID: 34351711 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of corneal confocal microscopy for assessing mild diabetic neuropathy: baseline findings of the LANDMark study.Clin Exp Optom. 2012 May;95(3):348-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00740.x. Epub 2012 Apr 29. Clin Exp Optom. 2012. PMID: 22540156
-
Corneal Confocal Microscopy Identifies People with Type 1 Diabetes with More Rapid Corneal Nerve Fibre Loss and Progression of Neuropathy.J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 18;11(8):2249. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082249. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35456342 Free PMC article.
-
Mosaic vs. Single Image Analysis with Confocal Microscopy of the Corneal Nerve Plexus for Diagnosis of Early Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Dec;11(6):2211-2223. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00574-z. Epub 2022 Oct 3. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022. PMID: 36184730 Free PMC article.
-
Corneal confocal microscopy for assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a meta-analysis.Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;100(1):9-14. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306038. Epub 2015 Feb 12. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 25677672 Review.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous