Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 1;15(5):4541-4556.
doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2034. Epub 2025 Apr 16.

Ultrasound evaluation of changes in endometrial receptivity from the day of ovulation to the day of transfer in patients with a history of intrauterine adhesions: a prospective cohort study

Affiliations

Ultrasound evaluation of changes in endometrial receptivity from the day of ovulation to the day of transfer in patients with a history of intrauterine adhesions: a prospective cohort study

Yangqin Peng et al. Quant Imaging Med Surg. .

Abstract

Background: High rates of infertility and pregnancy complications in patients with intrauterine adhesion (IUA) even after surgical repair may be associated with poor endometrial receptivity (ER). In our previous study, we found that changes occurred in ER from the day of ovulation to the day of transfer in patients with a normal uterine cavity during natural cycles. However, the changes in ER ultrasound indicators in patients with a history of IUA during natural cycles are unclear, and this study thus aimed to analyze these changes.

Methods: A prospective cohort study of 161 women with a history of IUA who underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) was conducted. ER changes from ovulation to the transfer day in the overall, clinically pregnant, and nonpregnant populations were analyzed. Patients were further allocated to the mild IUA or moderate-to-severe IUA subgroup based on the degree of IUA.

Results: Endometrial morphology was mainly type C (a "triple-line" endometrium) on the ovulation day, but type B (an echo of the endometrium similar to that of the surrounding uterine muscle layer) was predominant on the transfer day. From ovulation to the day of transfer in the overall population, there were no statistically significant differences in endometrial blood flow classification or subendometrial volume, but there was an increase in endometrial thickness (9.49±1.89 vs. 10.00±2.17 mm; P<0.001) and decreases in other indicators (P<0.05). The changes in the pregnant group were consistent with the direction of changes in the overall population, except for subendometrial volume (9.89±2.33 vs. 9.55±2.23 mL; P=0.017), whereas there were no significant differences in the nonpregnant group, except for the frequency of endometrial peristalsis (1.67±1.37 vs. 0.49±0.92 times/min; P<0.001). From ovulation to the day of transfer in the moderate-to-severe IUA population, there were significant increases in endometrial thickness (9.01±1.68 vs. 9.51±1.99 mm; P=0.002), vascularization index (VI; 1.92±2.58 vs. 1.99±3.39; P=0.019), and vascularization flow index (VFI; 0.65±1.18 vs. 0.72±1.46; P=0.010), whereas there were decreases in other indicators (P<0.05). From ovulation to the day of transfer in the mild IUA population, there was a significant increase in endometrial thickness (10.04±1.99 vs. 10.57±2.23 mm, P=0.011) and decreases in other indicators (P<0.05).

Conclusions: During natural cycles, in patients with a history of IUA, endometrial morphology mainly changed from type C to B, thickness increased, and the volume and frequency of peristalsis decreased. The blood supply of both the endometrium and subendometrium decreased significantly in the pregnant group. These findings provide a better understanding of the changes in ER in such patients, which is helpful for their pretransfer conversation.

Keywords: Endometrial receptivity (ER); intrauterine adhesion (IUA); ovulation day; transfer day; ultrasound evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-24-2034/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Two-dimensional ultrasound image showing endometrial morphology. (A) Type A. (B) Type B. (C) Type C.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Power Doppler image showing the blood flow pattern of the endometrium. (A) Pattern I. (B) Pattern II. (C) Pattern III.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Three-dimensional image showing the vascularization parameters of the endometrium and endometrial volume. The yellow circle depicts the area of the endometrium, with 4.73 as its volume.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Flowchart of patient inclusion.

Similar articles

References

    1. McCulloch TA, Wagner B, Duffy S, Barik S, Smith JH. The pathology of hysterectomy specimens following trans-cervical resection of the endometrium. Histopathology 1995;27:541-7. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1995.tb00325.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Katz Z, Ben-Arie A, Lurie S, Manor M, Insler V. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in Asherman's syndrome. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1996;41:462-5. - PubMed
    1. Bosteels J, Weyers S, Mol BW, D'Hooghe T. Anti-adhesion barrier gels following operative hysteroscopy for treating female infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Surg 2014;11:113-27. 10.1007/s10397-014-0832-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johary J, Xue M, Zhu X, Xu D, Velu PP. Efficacy of estrogen therapy in patients with intrauterine adhesions: systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:44-54. 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shaffer W. Role of uterine adhesions in the cause of multiple pregnancy losses. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1986;29:912-24. 10.1097/00003081-198612000-00016 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources