Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 1;15(5):4641-4654.
doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1796. Epub 2025 Apr 28.

Development and validation of a nomogram based on conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules

Affiliations

Development and validation of a nomogram based on conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules

Qi-Guo Wang et al. Quant Imaging Med Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Conventional ultrasound (US) has been routinely used for differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules, but its discriminatory performance remains unsatisfactory. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction nomogram model based on conventional US and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features for differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.

Methods: A total of 815 thyroid nodules with surgical pathology results and complete conventional US and CEUS data were retrospectively collected from the First People's Hospital of Qinzhou between January 2019 and July 2023. The nodules were grouped into a training cohort (n=571) and a validation cohort (n=244) at a 7:3 ratio. Independent risk factors of malignancy were selected by stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a prediction nomogram model was subsequently constructed. The diagnostic performance of the model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in both the training and validation cohorts. The unnecessary fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) rate was calculated.

Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified irregular margin, aspect ratio >1, and microcalcification from conventional US images, as well as hypo-enhancement intensity and ring enhancement from CEUS images, as independent predictors for malignancy. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the prediction nomogram model were 0.947 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.928-0.966], 90.4%, 88.8%, and 89.8% in the training cohort, and 0.957 (95% CI: 0.928-0.986), 94.5%, 86.4%, and 91.8% in the validation cohort, respectively. Using the prediction model, the unnecessary FNAB rates reduced from 29.6% to 6.1% in the training cohort and from 29.3% to 6.7% in the validation cohort compared to the Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. Decision curve analysis demonstrated good clinical utility of the nomogram model.

Conclusions: The prediction nomogram model incorporating conventional US and CEUS features could effectively distinguish between malignant and benign thyroid nodules and reduce unnecessary FNAB rates.

Keywords: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); malignancy; nomogram; thyroid nodules.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-24-1796/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of patient selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ultrasound images of benign and malignant nodules. For a nodular goiter, conventional US showed iso-echoic echogenicity, aspect ratio <1, and regular margin (A), and CEUS showed iso-enhancement and presence of ring enhancement (arrows) (B). For a papillary thyroid carcinoma, conventional US showed hypo-echoic echogenicity, aspect ratio >1, microcalcification (red arrow), and irregular margin (C), and CEUS showed hypo-enhancement and centrifugal enhancement direction (arrows) (D). CEUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasound; US, ultrasound.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predictive nomogram to assess the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROC curves of the prediction model and single ultrasound feature in the training cohort (A) and validation cohort (B). ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Calibration curves of the prediction model in the training cohort (A) and validation cohort (B).
Figure 6
Figure 6
DCA of the prediction model and single ultrasound feature in the training cohort (A) and validation cohort (B). DCA, decision curve analysis.

Similar articles

References

    1. Dean DS, Gharib H. Epidemiology of thyroid nodules. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;22:901-11. 10.1016/j.beem.2008.09.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Durante C, Grani G, Lamartina L, Filetti S, Mandel SJ, Cooper DS. The Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules: A Review. JAMA 2018;319:914-24. 10.1001/jama.2018.0898 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolinski K, Stangierski A, Ruchala M. Comparison of diagnostic yield of core-needle and fine-needle aspiration biopsies of thyroid lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2017;27:431-6. 10.1007/s00330-016-4356-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baier ND, Hahn PF, Gervais DA, Samir A, Halpern EF, Mueller PR, Harisinghani MG. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: experience in a cohort of 944 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1175-9. 10.2214/AJR.08.1840 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raab SS, Vrbin CM, Grzybicki DM, Sudilovsky D, Balassanian R, Zarbo RJ, Meier FA. Errors in thyroid gland fine-needle aspiration. Am J Clin Pathol 2006;125:873-82. 10.1309/7RQE-37K6-439T-4PB4 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources