Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 19;9(1):e80.
doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.51. eCollection 2025.

Engage for equity plus: Transforming academic health centers to sustain patient/community engaged research structures, policies, and practices

Shannon Sanchez-Youngman  1 , Belkis Jacquez  1 , Prajakta Adsul  2   3 , Elizabeth Dickson  1 , Tabia Henry Akintobi  4 , LaShawn Hoffman  5 , Lisa G Rosas  6 , Starla Gay  7 , Jason A Mendoza  8 , Diane Mapes  9 , John Oetzel  10 , Donald Nease  11 , Nina Wallerstein  1
Affiliations

Engage for equity plus: Transforming academic health centers to sustain patient/community engaged research structures, policies, and practices

Shannon Sanchez-Youngman et al. J Clin Transl Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) and patient/ community engaged research (P/CEnR) are shown to be effective approaches that improve health inequities, particularly among disadvantaged populations. While the science of CBPR demonstrates promising partnering practices that lead to effective interventions, there are institutional and structural barriers to creating and sustaining patient/community research within academic health centers (AHCs). As the field matures, there is a growing need to enhance patient/community leadership so that communities can set their own research agendas and priorities.

Methods: Engage for Equity PLUS sought to address these challenges by implementing an engagement intervention aimed at transforming AHCs through supporting champion teams of academic, community, and patient partners to strengthen research infrastructures for P/CEnR. This paper uses a qualitative, case study analysis to describe how E2PLUS enabled champion teams at Stanford School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson/University of Washington Cancer Consortium, and Morehouse School of Medicine to pursue institutional change strategies through coaching, workshops, contextual data analysis, and a community of practice.

Results: This paper describes key themes of how E2Plus helped identify targets of change by a) using institutional data collection as core to generating critical consciousness of contextual conditions; b) implementing feasible E2PLUS strategies to leverage conditions for catalyzing a champion team for advocacy and achievable actions; c) identifying the critical role of patients/community members in stimulating change; and d) the role of continual collective reflection.

Conclusion: We discuss the overall implications for E2 PLUS for other AHCs working toward sustainable community/patient engaged research policies and practices.

Keywords: Patient and community engaged research; academic health center; champion teams; collective reflection; community-based participatory research; institutional change; structural barriers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Core E2 PLUS intervention components.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Suarez-Balcazar Y, Francisco VT, Rubén Chávez N. Applying community-based participatory approaches to addressing health disparities and promoting health equity. Am J Community Psychol. 2020;66(3-4):217–221. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12487. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duran B, Oetzel J, Magarati M, et al. Toward health equity: a national study of promising practices in community-based participatory research. Prog Community Health Partnersh Res Educ Action. 2019;13(4):337–352. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0067. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen TT, Wallerstein N, Das R, et al. Conducting community-based participatory research with minority communities to reduce health disparities. In: The Science of Health Disparities Research. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2021: 171–186. doi: 10.1002/9781119374855.ch11. - DOI
    1. Wallerstein N, Oetzel JG, Sanchez-Youngman S, et al. Engage for equity: a long-term study of community-based participatory research and community-engaged research practices and outcomes. Health Educ Behav. 2020;47(3):380–390. doi: 10.1177/1090198119897075. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Israel BA, Lachance L, Coombe CM, et al. Measurement approaches to partnership success: theory and methods for measuring success in long-standing community-based participatory research partnerships. Prog Community Health Partnersh Res Educ Action. 2020;14(1):129–140. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources