Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion for Patients with Invasive Fungal Disease and Febrile Neutropenia: A Registry-Based, Multicenter, Retrospective, Real-World Study
- PMID: 40384797
- PMCID: PMC12085143
- DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S494985
Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion for Patients with Invasive Fungal Disease and Febrile Neutropenia: A Registry-Based, Multicenter, Retrospective, Real-World Study
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) in treating patients with invasive fungal disease (IFD) or febrile neutropenia.
Patients and methods: This study retrospectively included patients diagnosed with IFD or febrile neutropenia who received ABCD treatment from 22 hospitals. The efficacy and safety were evaluated at the end of ABCD treatment. The characteristics of patients diagnosed with possible, probable and proven IFD according to the revised EORTC-MSG criteria were then further analyzed to conduct sensitivity analysis.
Results: A total of 503 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 391 received ABCD treatment for a minimum of seven days, and the overall efficacy of ABCD was determined to be 71.87% (281/391). 183 patients were diagnosed with possible, probable and proven IFD, the ABCD efficacy of whom was 67.76% (124/183). The efficacy of ABCD in patients with hematologic malignancies, AIDS and diabetes was 70.10% (211/301), 88.24% (30/34), and 83.33% (10/12), respectively. In terms of various fungal species, the efficacy of ABCD in patients with Aspergillus, Mucorales and Candida infections was 62.96% (34/54), 80.49% (33/41) and 66.67% (22/33), respectively. For patients in the targeted therapy, diagnostic-driven therapy, and empirical therapy groups, the efficacy of ABCD was 76.92% (60/78), 70.17% (207/295), and 77.78% (14/18), respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were infusion reactions (30.22%, 152/503) and hypokalemia (38.97%, 196/503), with the majority of these AEs classified as grade 1-2. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05116059.
Conclusion: ABCD has demonstrated satisfactory therapeutic efficacy and safety in the treatment of IFD or febrile neutropenia.
Keywords: amphotericin B colloidal dispersion; antifungal therapy; febrile neutropenia; invasive fungal disease.
© 2025 Zhang et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Liposomal amphotericin B: a review of its use as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia and in the treatment of invasive fungal infections.Drugs. 2009;69(3):361-92. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010. Drugs. 2009. PMID: 19275278 Review.
-
Amphotericin-B colloidal dispersion. A review of its use against systemic fungal infections and visceral leishmaniasis.Drugs. 1998 Sep;56(3):365-83. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856030-00008. Drugs. 1998. PMID: 9777313 Review.
-
Empirical antifungal treatment for diagnosed and undiagnosed invasive fungal disease in patients with hematologic malignancies.Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jul;34(7):1209-1216. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1386167. Epub 2017 Oct 27. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018. PMID: 28956459
-
Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (Amphocil) vs fluconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in neutropenic patients: data of a prematurely stopped clinical trial.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Apr;25(8):879-84. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702243. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000. PMID: 10808210 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized, double-blind clinical trial of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion vs. amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of fever and neutropenia.Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Aug;27(2):296-302. doi: 10.1086/514672. Clin Infect Dis. 1998. PMID: 9709879 Clinical Trial.
References
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical