Assessment of eHealth literacy among cardiovascular disease patients and analysis of influencing factors
- PMID: 40385625
- PMCID: PMC12082720
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1587163
Assessment of eHealth literacy among cardiovascular disease patients and analysis of influencing factors
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the eHealth literacy of patients with cardiovascular diseases and uncover the associated influencing factors. The findings are intended to lay a solid foundation for formulating targeted strategies to enhance the health literacy of this patient population.
Methods: Between October 2023 and June 2024, a purposive sampling approach was employed to recruit patients with cardiovascular diseases visiting the cardiology department of a tertiary hospital in Shandong Province. The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) was utilized to assess the eHealth literacy levels of the participants. Based on the assessment results, the subjects were classified into qualified and unqualified groups. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the influencing factors underlying eHealth literacy.
Results: The eHealth literacy score among cardiovascular disease patients was 20.46 ± 9.54, with a passing rate of 38.6%. The overall mean score across all items was 2.5 ± 1.19. Specifically, for the sub-domains of internet health information service capabilities and application abilities, evaluation capabilities of internet health information and services, and decision - making capabilities of internet health information and services, the mean scores were 2.49 ± 1.18, 2.67 ± 1.32, and 2.66 ± 1.35, respectively. Findings from binary logistic regression analysis suggest that education level, sleep quality, residing in close proximity to a medical institution (distance < 5 km), prior utilization of medical information websites or search engines, as well as the interaction between proactive health awareness and utilization of medical information websites or search engines, were all influencing factors for the qualification of e - health literacy (p < 0.05). These results underscore the complex interplay of multiple factors in determining patients' eHealth literacy levels, which has important implications for the design and implementation of effective health information dissemination and patient education strategies in the digital age.
Conclusion: Our findings reveal that the eHealth literacy among cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients remains at a relatively low level. This situation underscores the urgent need for interventions aimed at enhancing patients' proactive health awareness and delivering targeted eHealth training programs. Specifically, such initiatives should be designed to enable patients to accurately access, comprehensively understand, critically evaluate, and effectively apply health information in the digital realm. By doing so, we can empower CVD patients to better manage their health in the context of the digital age, ultimately leading to an improvement in their eHealth literacy levels. These efforts are not only crucial for individual patient care but also have broader implications for optimizing health outcomes at a population level.
Keywords: cardiovascular disease; eHealth literacy; health education; health literacy; influencing factors.
Copyright © 2025 Wang, Jiao, Zhao, Chen, Jiang and Zhang.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Digital Health Literacy and Attitudes Toward eHealth Technologies Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Their Implications for Secondary Prevention: Survey Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 19;9:e63057. doi: 10.2196/63057. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 40106277 Free PMC article.
-
eHealth Literacy and Health-Related Internet Use Among Swedish Primary Health Care Visitors: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 5;8:e63288. doi: 10.2196/63288. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 39637377 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship Between Coronavirus-Related eHealth Literacy and COVID-19 Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among US Adults: Web-Based Survey Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 29;23(3):e25042. doi: 10.2196/25042. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33626015 Free PMC article.
-
eHealth literacy among hospital health care providers: a systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):1144. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10103-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37875882 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of eHealth literacy interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies.BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 23;25(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21354-x. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39849354 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Zhang AY, Kong LZ. The epidemic situation and prevention countermeasures of chronic diseases. Chin J Pre Contr Chron Dis. (2005) 1:1–3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3141.2020.54.193 - DOI
-
- Machado DB, Pescarini JM, Ramos D, Teixeira R, Lozano R, Pereira VOM, et al. . Monitoring the progress of health-related sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Brazilian states using the global burden of disease indicators. Popul Health Metrics. (2020) 18:7. doi: 10.1186/s12963-020-00207-2, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Wu SY, Cai YY, Xu XY, Zheng KC, Li HY. Challenges and opportunities of "medical-prevention" integration for common chronic diseases in China. Chin J Public Health. (2019) 35:1289–92. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1126005 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical