Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 2:13:1490393.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1490393. eCollection 2025.

Unequal benefits: the effects of health insurance integration on consumption inequality in rural China

Affiliations

Unequal benefits: the effects of health insurance integration on consumption inequality in rural China

Linlin Han. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Unlocking the consumption potential of rural residents and narrowing the consumption gap is crucial for expanding domestic demand and enhancing social equity. This study examined how integrating Urban-Rural Residents Medical Insurance (URRMI) affected consumption inequality among rural residents and its underlying mechanisms.

Methods: We analyzed 17,092 observations from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) 2012-2018. Consumption inequality was measured using the Kakwani relative deprivation index. A staggered difference-in-differences (DID) design with high-dimensional fixed effects was employed to analyze the impact of the urban-rural health insurance integration policy on consumption inequality. Robustness checks such as placebo tests, heterogeneity in treatment effects, and spatial spillover analyses were addressed.

Results: The findings reveal that the policy significantly raises consumption levels among middle and high-income groups while concurrently reducing expenditures for the lowest-income bracket, exacerbating consumption inequality. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the impact of urban-rural health insurance integration on rural consumption inequality is manifested in both consumption structure and life-cycle effects, with the most significant disparities observed in subsistence and enjoyment consumption, particularly among middle-aged and older age groups. Mechanism analysis identifies increased utilization of medical services, the release of precautionary savings among middle and high-income cohorts, and variations in health insurance funding modalities as key drivers of the widening consumption inequality gap.

Discussion: The study concludes with recommendations to promote the establishment of parity in urban-rural integrated health insurance and to prioritize policy support for vulnerable groups, especially the older adult and impoverished households.

Keywords: consumption inequality; health insurance; relative deprivation index; rural residents; staggered difference-in-differences method; urban–rural health insurance integration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall and sub-consumption inequality indices. RD, RDLIV, RDDEV, and RDENJ represent the total consumption inequality index, the subsistence consumption inequality index, the development consumption inequality index, and the enjoyment consumption inequality index, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Parallel trend test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Non-parametric permutation test.

Similar articles

References

    1. Michie J. Inequality growth within countries, despite catch-up between countries. Int Rev Appl Econ. (2023) 37:187–9. doi: 10.1080/02692171.2023.2198329 - DOI
    1. Li S, Zhu M. Changes in residents' income gap in 40 years of China's economic transition. J Manag World. (2018) 34:19–28. doi: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2018.0030 - DOI
    1. Wu Y, Chen J, Bian Z, Wang H, Wang Z. Housing, housing stratification, and Chinese Urban residents’ social satisfaction: evidence from a National Household Survey. Soc Indic Res. (2020) 152:653–71. doi: 10.1007/s11205-020-02453-1 - DOI
    1. Wan H, Gustafsson B, Wang Y. Convergence of inequality dimensions in China: income, consumption, and wealth from 1988 to 2018. Rev Income Wealth. (2024) 70:1089–115. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12675 - DOI
    1. Dunn J, Park G, Brydon R, Wolfson M, Veall M, Rolheiser L, et al. . Income inequality and population health: a political-economic research agenda. J Epidemiol Community Health. (2022) 76:756–8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219252 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources