Comparison of Sensory Recovery between Random Pattern Flap and Axial Pattern Flap in Finger Defect Reconstruction
- PMID: 40385999
- PMCID: PMC12081082
- DOI: 10.1055/a-2521-2291
Comparison of Sensory Recovery between Random Pattern Flap and Axial Pattern Flap in Finger Defect Reconstruction
Abstract
Background This study aimed to investigate the association between the use of different flaps, including random and axial pattern flaps, and sensory recovery following finger soft tissue reconstruction using local pedicle flaps. Methods A longitudinal study was conducted on 115 patients with 130 finger soft tissue defects treated with local pedicle flaps between December 2016 and December 2020. Assessments were made at early postsurgery (119 flaps), 3 months postsurgery (110 soft tissue defects), and 6 months postsurgery (94 soft tissue defects). Sensory recovery outcomes were compared between soft tissue defects reconstructed using random and axial pattern flaps. Results In the early postsurgery period, there was a significantly higher prevalence of a static sense of two-point discrimination (s2PD) ≤6 mm among fingers with random pattern flaps (96.2%) than among fingers with axial pattern flaps (64.5%). The probability of s2PD ≤6 mm at the donor and recipient sites with the direct flap was 75.5% and 25.5%, respectively, which was significantly higher than that with the reversed flap. After 6 months, there was a significant difference in sensory recovery compared to that at 3 months postsurgery but not between different flap types. Conclusion Sensory recovery after reconstruction was observed with all flap types, and better sensory recovery can be achieved in a shorter time postsurgery using random pattern flaps.
Keywords: axial pattern flap; random pattern flap; sensory recovery; soft tissue defects.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest None declared.
Figures






Similar articles
-
A Novel Approach for Reconstruction of Finger Neurocutaneous Defect: A Sensory Reverse Dorsal Digital Artery Flap from the Neighboring Digit.Orthop Surg. 2017 Nov;9(4):372-379. doi: 10.1111/os.12350. Orthop Surg. 2017. PMID: 29178311 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Reverse digital artery island flap with versus without sensory nerve coaptation for finger pulp reconstruction.ANZ J Surg. 2023 Jan;93(1-2):281-287. doi: 10.1111/ans.18180. Epub 2022 Dec 1. ANZ J Surg. 2023. PMID: 36453612
-
Reconstruction of a neurocutaneous defect of the proximal phalanx with a heterodigital arterialised nerve pedicle flap.Injury. 2014 Apr;45(4):799-804. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.034. Epub 2013 Sep 27. Injury. 2014. PMID: 24125537
-
Direct and reversed dorsal digital island flaps: a review of 65 cases.Injury. 2014 Dec;45(12):2013-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.030. Epub 2014 Aug 20. Injury. 2014. PMID: 25205646 Review.
-
Regional flaps in facial reconstruction.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1990 Oct;23(5):925-46. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1990. PMID: 2259510 Review.
References
-
- Loréa P, Chahidi N, Marchesi S, Ezzedine R, Marin Braun F, Dury M. Reconstruction of fingertip defects with the neurovascular tranquilli-leali flap. J Hand Surg [Br] 2006;31(03):280–284. - PubMed
-
- Morrison E J, Morrison W AJ.Basic skin flaps and blood supply Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;(Mar):12–21.
-
- Etzkorn J R, Zito P M, Hohman M H, Council M. Advancement flaps. Coloproctology. 2025;43(01):38–45. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources