A Social Robot in Home Care: Acceptability and Utility Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
- PMID: 40386025
- PMCID: PMC12082092
- DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igaf019
A Social Robot in Home Care: Acceptability and Utility Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Abstract
Background and objectives: Social robots show great potential for delivering home-based aged care and supporting aging-in-place. This study aims to assess the acceptability of social robots in delivering home care to older adults across 7 domains: affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, and self-efficacy.
Research design and methods: This is a mixed-methods study. Thirty community-dwelling older adults, aged 51-88, engaged with a social robot, equipped with artificial intelligence and designed to interact with humans in a socially acceptable manner. The robot was operated 24/7 in participants' homes for 6 weeks. Descriptive analysis, latent growth mixture modeling, and thematic analysis were conducted for data analysis.
Results: Home-based robotic care was very well received. The average frequency of the use of different features of the robot was 23.4 times/person/day. Three trajectory groups of engagement in human-robot interactions were identified: those who are living alone or with an older spouse, with fair health and financial status were the most interactive group. Participants perceived the robot as user-friendly, manageable, and seamlessly integrated into their daily routine, such as reminding meal intake. The robot also reduced the stress of caregivers. It served as a companion and "good listener," ameliorating the feelings of loneliness, calming depressive emotions, and keeping participants informed about the outside world. Interestingly, participants believed that interacting with the robot enabled them to engage with contemporary technologies, acquire new skills, and showcase their fashion sense in front of friends.
Discussion and implications: Home-based robots are acceptable and manageable by older adults. Future studies should examine the effectiveness of home-based robotic care on enhancing the health-related outcomes of older adults. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT06487611.
Keywords: Aged care; Aging-in-place; Home care; Home settings; Robotic care.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Gerontological Society of America.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Effects of Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use of Humanoid Robots in Care for Older Adults: Postinteraction Cross-Sectional Study.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 4;25:e46617. doi: 10.2196/46617. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37540548 Free PMC article.
-
User-Centered Design of Companion Robot Pets Involving Care Home Resident-Robot Interactions and Focus Groups With Residents, Staff, and Family: Qualitative Study.JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Nov 1;8(4):e30337. doi: 10.2196/30337. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021. PMID: 34723825 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the Social Well-Being of Single Older Adults Using the LOVOT Social Robot: Qualitative Phenomenological Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 23;11:e56669. doi: 10.2196/56669. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024. PMID: 39178408 Free PMC article.
-
Friends from the Future: A Scoping Review of Research into Robots and Computer Agents to Combat Loneliness in Older People.Clin Interv Aging. 2021 May 24;16:941-971. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S282709. eCollection 2021. Clin Interv Aging. 2021. PMID: 34079242 Free PMC article.
-
Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):e033096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033096. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 31924639 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barrett, P., Hale, B., & Gauld, R. (2012). Social inclusion through ageing-in-place with care? Ageing & Society, 32(3), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x11000341 - DOI
-
- Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaat5954. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Braun, V., & Clarke, T. (2012). Thematic analysis. In Cooper H. (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
-
- Census and Statistic Department. (2017). Population projections. https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/en/EIndexbySubject.html?pcode=FA100061&scode...
-
- Chiu, C. J., Lo, Y. H., Ho, M. H., Montayre, J., & Zhao, I. Y. (2022). Association between loneliness and acceptance of using robots and pets as companions among older Chinese immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 41(3), 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13075 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical