Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Apr 22;22(10):2298-2307.
doi: 10.7150/ijms.111843. eCollection 2025.

Long-term BPV is an Independent Risk Factor for Renal Prognosis in Hypertensive Patients - a Post-hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long-term BPV is an Independent Risk Factor for Renal Prognosis in Hypertensive Patients - a Post-hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Study

Yuyi Ruan et al. Int J Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Long-term blood pressure variability (BPV) reflects fluctuations in BP over time, which may indicate instability in precise blood pressure control. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the data from the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) to assess the effect and associated variables of BPV on the renal prognosis of patients with hypertension. Methods: Excluding patients with CKD, the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at the 1st, 6th, and 12th follow-up months were employed to calculate the SBP coefficient of variation (CV) which represented BPV. Patients were divided into four groups based on the quartiles of BPV, namely Q1 to Q4. Results: Group Q4 patients had higher baseline SBP. Multiple regression identified age, sex, treatment, current smoker, SBP, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASi), β-receptor antagonists, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and other medications use were factors associated with BPV. The survival analysis showed that group Q4 had significantly more renal outcome events, and BPV was independently associated with the risk of renal outcome events (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.23 - 1.54, P < 0.001). There was a direct correlation between the BPV and risk of renal outcomes when BPV exceeded 0.037. In addition, the RASi preference group reported a significantly higher incidence of renal outcome events compared to the non-preference group (log-rank test χ² = 6.218, P = 0.013) and exhibited a tendency towards higher BPV. Conclusions: High BPV is an independent risk factor for renal outcome events in hypertensive aging patients. The preference of RASi use can increase renal outcome events, but is not related to the rise in BPV. These findings suggest that in elderly hypertensive patients with elevated BPV, the potential risks of RASi-associated renal outcomes may outweigh its established benefits, necessitating cautious consideration of alternative antihypertensive strategies.

Keywords: blood pressure; blood pressure variability; hypertension; renal insufficiency; renin angiotensin system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Follow-up of 5849 cases of hypertension. (A) Enrollment flow chart for the analysis of 5849 cases of hypertension. (B) Systolic blood pressure, (C) Diastolic blood pressure and (D) eGFR levels during follow-up. Abbreviations: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Q1 to Q4, lowest to highest quartile.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of BPV on renal prognosis in hypertensive patients. (A) Survival curves for renal outcome events according to BPV quartiles. (B) Spline plots for risk of renal outcome events over the range of BPV. Curves represent hazard ratios (solid dark color line) and 95% CI (light color lines) based on restricted cubic splines analysis. (C) Survival curves for renal outcome events according to intensive treatment under BPV groups. (D) Forest plot for interaction effect between BPV and intensive treatment. Abbreviations: BPV, blood pressure variability; Q1 to Q4, lowest to highest quartile.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Renal outcome events survival curves according to antihypertensive drug types and association of BPV with antihypertensive drug types. (A) Renal outcome event survival curves according to the use of RASi. (B) Renal outcome event survival curves according to the use of β-receptor antagonists. (C) Renal outcome event survival curves according to the use of CCBs. (D) Survival curves for renal outcomes according to use of diuretics. (E) Comparison of BPV between medication preference and non-preference groups. CCBs, calcium channel blockers; RASi, renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors.

Similar articles

References

    1. Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, Riley LM, Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA. et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. The Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):957–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen TN, Chow CK. Global and national high blood pressure burden and control. The Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):932–3. - PubMed
    1. Shulman R, Cohen JB. Resistant Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Burden unto Itself. CJASN. 2022 Oct 1;17(10):1436–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The SPRINT Research Group. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pallikadavath S, Chambers L, Shepherd D, Sukhnani M, Medcalf JF, Gray LJ. et al. The association of blood pressure variability with adverse outcomes in a primary care chronic kidney disease cohort. J Hypertens. 2021 Oct 1;39(10):2067–74. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances