Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 30;16(2):404-414.
doi: 10.21037/jgo-2025-131. Epub 2025 Apr 17.

Comprehensive genomic profiling of small bowel adenocarcinoma with liver metastasis

Affiliations

Comprehensive genomic profiling of small bowel adenocarcinoma with liver metastasis

Ruixia Jie et al. J Gastrointest Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a malignant tumor with a relatively low prevalence. Metastasis, especially liver metastasis (LM), is an important prognostic indicator of poor prognosis in patients with SBA. Due to the rarity of SBA, there is currently a lack of research on the characteristics of liver metastases in small intestine cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate the molecular characteristics associated with metastasis in SBA and to explore the specific molecular combinations related to LM.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed on patients with SBA who were admitted to Zhejiang Hospital and Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital from July 2013 to July 2022. Sequencing with tissue was performed using a 1,021-gene panel. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used to identify the genes for predicting LM from SBA.

Results: A total of 97 patients with SBA, including 48 patients without metastasis, 29 with LM, and 20 with extrahepatic metastasis (EHM), were enrolled in this cohort. The five genes with the highest mutation frequency in the overall samples were TP53, KRAS, APC, CDKN2A, and SMAD4, with 176 actionable mutations that had potential impact on therapy being detected in 77 (79%) cases. TP53 was significantly more frequently mutated in the LM than in the non-LM (NLM) groups. Nine genes were selected via LASSO regression to construct the LM prediction model, which generated an area under curve of 0.867. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the validation cohort was 0.724.

Conclusions: This study elucidated the molecular characteristics of metastatic SBA and found that TP53 mutations were associated with LM in SBA. These results deepen our understanding of the occurrence and development of SBA and the potential mechanisms of LM in SBA.

Keywords: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA); genomic landscape; liver metastasis (LM); prediction model; risk factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-2025-131/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Genetic analysis of primary tumors from the SBA cohorts. (A) Mutational landscape of small-bowel cancer. Each row represents a gene, and each column represents a patient. The mutation frequency of each gene is shown on the left side of the mutation heatmap. The number of detected mutations in a single sample is shown above the mutation heatmap. The detection frequency of genes is shown on the right-hand side of the mutation heatmap. (B) Alterations in drug targetable genes in small-bowel cancer samples. EHM, extrahepatic metastasis; LM, liver metastasis; SBA, small-bowel cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Genomic alteration frequencies between the metastatic group and the non-metastatic group (A), LM group and NLM group (C), LM group, EHM group and non-metastatic group (E). The frequencies of actionable genes mutations between the metastatic group and the non-metastatic group (B), LM group and NLM group (D), LM group, EHM group and non-metastatic group (F). EHM, extrahepatic metastasis; LM, liver metastasis; NLM, non-liver metastasis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparisons of the gene mutation rates in the different subgroups. EHM, extrahepatic metastasis; LM, liver metastasis; NLM, non-liver metastasis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The ROC curve of prediction model in the (A) construction and (B) validation cohort. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve.

Similar articles

References

    1. Symons R, Daly D, Gandy R, et al. Progress in the Treatment of Small Intestine Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023;24:241-61. 10.1007/s11864-023-01058-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colina A, Hwang H, Wang H, et al. Natural history and prognostic factors for localised small bowel adenocarcinoma. ESMO Open 2020;5:e000960. 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000960 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vashistha N, Singhal D. Current Oncologic Standards for Surgery of Small Bowel Cancers. J Gastrointest Cancer 2022;53:434-8. 10.1007/s12029-021-00635-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sakae H, Kanzaki H, Nasu J, et al. The characteristics and outcomes of small bowel adenocarcinoma: a multicentre retrospective observational study. Br J Cancer 2017;117:1607-13. 10.1038/bjc.2017.338 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Back TR, Linssen JDG, van Erning FN, et al. Incidence, clinical management and prognosis of patients with small intestinal adenocarcinomas from 1999 through 2019: A nationwide Dutch cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2024;199:113529. 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113529 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources