Educational and Socioeconomic Correlates of Stroke Risk Behaviors: Findings from the SPRINT INDIA Trial
- PMID: 40387006
- DOI: 10.4103/aian.aian_933_24
Educational and Socioeconomic Correlates of Stroke Risk Behaviors: Findings from the SPRINT INDIA Trial
Abstract
Background and objectives: Secondary Prevention by Structured Semi-Interactive Stroke Prevention Package in India (SPRINT INDIA) trial was a randomized control trial that enrolled 4298 stroke patients and administered educational interventions at 31 centers across India, with the aim to reduce recurrent stroke through increased stroke knowledge. This SPRINT INDIA trial post hoc study aims to investigate the incidence of recurrent stroke, high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), death, and lifestyle behavioral factors at 1 year. In addition, it examines the relationship between patients' baseline characteristics and education levels, risk factors, and outcomes and performs subgroup analysis within the intervention and control groups.
Methods: Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either intervention or control group through computer-based randomization on web. Intervention included stroke prevention Short Message Service messages, short-duration videos, and printed workbooks. Baseline assessments captured demographic and educational data, classifying patients into three categories: no schooling, less than high school, and high school or above. Primary outcome was a composite of recurrent stroke, high-risk TIA, ACS, and mortality at 1 year. Chi-square tests and analysis of variance were used to evaluate educational disparities across various variables.
Results: The intervention did not reduce primary outcomes at 1 year among patients with different educational levels. Higher educational group was associated with enhanced medication adherence (94.3% vs 85.4%; P < 0.001), increased physical activity (5497.91 ± 4117.7 vs 6169.91±4828.8; P < 0.001), lower triglyceride levels, and decreased engagement in behavioral risk factors like alcohol intake (5.1% vs 6.8%; P = 0.013) and tobacco use (smoked and chewed) (4% vs 7.9%; P < 0.001 and 5.8% vs 11.6%; P = 0.020).
Conclusions: Personalized secondary stroke prevention, tailored to educational levels, is crucial for effective stroke management.
Keywords: Stroke; education; outcomes; recurrent stroke; risk factors.
Copyright © 2025 Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology.
References
-
- Mathew T, John SK, Souza DD, Nadig R, Badachi S, Sarma GR. Recurrent ischemic strokes: “Discontinuation of antiplatelet drugs appears to be an important preventable cause”. Neurol India 2021;69:1743-6.
-
- Kalkonde Y, Jadhao S, Deshmukh M, Gupta SS, Bang A. Gaps in secondary prevention among stroke survivors in rural Gadchiroli, India: A community-based cross-sectional study. Wellcome Open Res 2020;5:263.
-
- Pandian JD, Kate MP, Sylaja PN, Khurana D, Pamidimukkala V, Ray BK, et al. Secondary prevention with a structured semi-interactive stroke prevention package in INDIA (SPRINT INDIA): A multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health 2023;11:e425-35.
-
- Kate MP, Arora D, Verma SJ, Sylaja PN, Renjith V, Sharma M, et al. SPRINT India Collaborators. Secondary prevention by structured semi-interactive stroke prevention package in India (SPRINT INDIA) study protocol. Int J Stroke 2020;15:109-15.
-
- McHutchison CA, Backhouse EV, Cvoro V, Shenkin SD, Wardlaw JM. Education, socioeconomic status, and intelligence in childhood and stroke risk in later life: A meta-analysis. Epidemiology 2017;28:608-18.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
