Risk of adverse events of psoriasis treatment with biologic agents and new small molecules-BIOBADADERM Registry
- PMID: 40387427
- DOI: 10.1111/jdv.20738
Risk of adverse events of psoriasis treatment with biologic agents and new small molecules-BIOBADADERM Registry
Abstract
Background: Registry studies are needed to provide comprehensive and updated assessments of the long-term safety profiles of systemic drugs in psoriasis.
Objectives: To analyse the safety of biologic drugs and new oral molecules used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in patients included in the Spanish Registry of Adverse Events of Biological Therapy (BIOBADADERM), compared to that of adalimumab.
Methods: Prospective, multicentre cohort of patients with psoriasis. The safety profiles of biologic agents (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab), apremilast and dimethyl fumarate were studied. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) and adjusted IRR of specific adverse events were assessed for each drug, using adalimumab as a reference. Propensity scores were used to adjust for selection bias.
Results: Our study included 4212 patients (7590 treatment cycles; 17,284 patient-years of follow-up). Adalimumab had an incidence rate for all adverse events of 614 per 1000 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI] (591; 637)). The risk of all adverse events was significantly lower for guselkumab (adjusted IRR [aIRR] 0.56, 95% CI (0.47; 0.67)), risankizumab (aIRR 0.59, 95% CI (0.48; 0.71)), tildrakizumab [aIRR 0.6, 95% CI (0.46; 0.8)], ixekizumab (aIRR 0.65, 95% CI (0.56; 0.76)) and ustekinumab (aIRR 0.73 95% CI (0.65; 0.82)) compared to adalimumab (p ≤ 0.002), as well as the risk for some specific organ-based groups of adverse events. Conversely, the risk for all adverse events was significantly higher for dimethyl fumarate (aIRR 3.67, 95% CI (2.71; 4.97)), infliximab (aIRR 1.88, 95% CI (1.45; 2.43)) (p ≤ 0.002) and apremilast (aIRR 1.27, 95% CI (1.05; 1.53)) (p 0.012). The risk of malignant neoplasms was significantly reduced in the group treated with ixekizumab (aIRR 0.14 95% CI (0.04; 0.47)).
Conclusions: Our data support that, overall, the new biologic treatments have a superior safety profile in real-world practice compared to adalimumab and its biosimilars.
© 2025 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Garcia‐Doval I, Carretero G, Vanaclocha F, Ferrandiz C, Daudén E, Sánchez‐Carazo JL, et al. Risk of serious adverse events associated with biologic and nonbiologic psoriasis systemic therapy: patients ineligible vs eligible for randomized controlled trials. Arch Dermatol. 2012;148(4):463–470.
-
- Eichler HG, Abadie E, Breckenridge A, Flamion B, Gustafsson LL, Leufkens H, et al. Bridging the efficacy‐effectiveness gap: a regulator's perspective on addressing variability of drug response. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(7):495–506.
-
- Yiu ZZN, Mason KJ, Barker JNWN, Hampton PJ, McElhone K, Smith CH, et al. A standardization approach to compare treatment safety and effectiveness outcomes between clinical trials and real‐world populations in psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(6):1265–1271.
-
- Montero‐Vilchez T, Grau‐Perez M, Garcia‐Doval I. Epidemiology and geographic distribution of generalized pustular psoriasis in Spain: a National Population‐Based Study of hospital admissions from 2016 to 2020. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2023;114(2):97–101.
-
- Daudén E, Carretero G, Rivera R, Ferrándiz C, Llamas‐Velasco M, de la Cueva P, et al. Long‐term safety of nine systemic medications for psoriasis: a cohort study using the Spanish registry of adverse events for biological therapy in dermatological diseases (BIOBADADERM) registry. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):139–150.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical