Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;12(29):e17204.
doi: 10.1002/advs.202417204. Epub 2025 May 19.

Unassisted Switchable Dual-Photoelectrode Devices Utilizing p-n Carbon Quantum Dots as "Semiconductor Electrolytes": Optimization Between H2O2 and Solar Electricity Production

Affiliations

Unassisted Switchable Dual-Photoelectrode Devices Utilizing p-n Carbon Quantum Dots as "Semiconductor Electrolytes": Optimization Between H2O2 and Solar Electricity Production

Hui-Min Duan et al. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Switchable self-driven photoelectrochemical (PEC) devices are developed to boost H2O2 or electricity generation under visible-light illumination, in which p-n type carbon quantum dots (N-CQDs) is applied as conceptually-new "semiconductor electrolytes". The N-CQDs contains N-dopants, and both negatively- and positively-charged surface groups. This allows N-CQDs to act as the electrolyte and to interact with both a BiVO4 photoanode and a Cu2O photocathode. In a two-compartment cell with a separating membrane, N-CQDs can dynamically form p-n heterojunctions with the photoanode or the photocathode, facilitating charge separation. In this setup, the fine-tuned electronic structure of N-CQDs promotes the two-electron reactions with water or O2 to produce H2O2, achieving a rate of 28 µm min-1 and Faradic efficiency exceeding 80%. Switching into a one-compartment cell, N-CQDs promotes four-electron charge transfer and stabilizes the photoelectrodes, giving electricity output for over 120 h. This control over electron transfer, selectivity, and durability cannot be achieved using traditional electrolytes.

Keywords: H2O2 production; dual‐photoelectrode; electricity production; electrolyte optimization; p‐n carbon dots.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characterization of the N‐CQDs. a) TEM spectra of N‐CQDs. b) Raman spectrum of N‐CQDs. High‐resolution c) C1s, d) N1s, and e) O1s XPS spectra of N‐CQDs. f) Schematic synthesis and proposed structure of N‐CQDs. g) Mott–Schottky plots of N‐CQDs showing the co‐existence of n‐ and p‐type conductivities. h) The band levels (left) and electron cloud distributions (right) of the LUMO and the HOMO from the DFT model of N‐CQDs. i) Energy band diagrams for p‐n junctions of N‐CQDs with BiVO4 and Cu2O respectively, and the band locations of BiVO4 in KHCO3 solution and Cu2O in citrate‐phosphate buffer solution. V fn denotes the Fermi level corresponding to the n‐type semiconductor behavior of N‐CQDs, and V fp represents the Fermi level associated with its p‐type semiconductor behavior. Both are taken from the intercept with the x‐axis in g).
Figure 2
Figure 2
a,b) The ORR LSV and H2O2 generation of a Cu2O photocathode (2 cm2) in N‐CQDs or buffer solution in a three‐electrode configuration. c,d) The WOR LSV and H2O2 generation of a BiVO4 photoanode (2 cm2) in N‐CQDs, KHCO3 or precursor solution in a three‐electrode configuration. In (c) the PEC region starts at 0.32 V and the electrochemical (EC) region at 1.8 V given by the onset potential for N‐CQDs in light and dark, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
a) LSV intersections of photoanodic and photocathodic systems in a three‐electrode configuration. b) Schematic diagrams for the membrane‐separated two‐compartment cell and one‐compartment cell. c–g) LSV curves with chopped light irradiation, long‐time PEC operation, the sum of H2O2, FE generation, and IPCE on the photoanode and photocathode (6 cm2 electrode area) in different electrolytes and different cell setups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The J–V curve for the one‐compartment cell and calculated power density curve in a) N‐CQDs solution under air or O2‐saturated conditions, and b) in different O2‐saturated electrolyte solutions. c) The image for lightening a LED light by the light‐driven one‐compartment cell in N‐CQDs solution.
Figure 5
Figure 5
a) OCVD of the separated two‐compartment cell in different solutions. b) Mechanisms for the two‐compartment cell in N‐CQDs solutions. c,d) LSV curves and corresponding K‐L plots of the two‐compartment cell in N‐CQDs or KHCO3 buffer solutions respectively. e) Mott–Schottky plot and locations of the reference CQDs. f) The i‐t curves for photoanodic systems or photocathodic systems respectively in N‐CQDs solution or reference CQDs solution.
Figure 6
Figure 6
a) Fitted Nyquist plots of the EIS spectra for the one‐compartment cell in different solutions. b) SEM images of BiVO4 electrodes before (top left) and in different solutions after PEC operation (20 h) in a one‐compartment cell. c,d) EPR spectra of the BiVO4, N‐CQDs, and Cu2O modified FTO plate in DMSO or water respectively with DMPO as trapping agent. Note: The loose contact of components lead to the unavoidable formation of p‐n junctions between BiVO4 and N‐CQDs, therefore, holes were abstracted by N‐CQDs, and a minor signal ascribed to the DMPO‐C adduct was observed (αN = 16.2 G, αH = 23.3 G). (e) Mechanism of the one‐compartment cell in N‐CQDs solution. f,g) Potential application scenarios of the one‐compartment cell as a light indicator.

Similar articles

References

    1. a) Lee S., Bae H.‐S., Choi W., Acc. Chem. Res. 2023, 56, 867; - PMC - PubMed
    2. b) Wan X., Zhu G., Zhou Z., Guan X., Mater. Today Catal. 2024, 4, 100042.
    1. Xia C., Xia Y., Zhu P., Fan L., Wang H., Science 2019, 366, 226. - PubMed
    1. a) Sun X., Yang J., Zeng X., Guo L., Bie C., Wang Z., Sun K., Sahu A. K., Tebyetekerwa M., Rufford T. E., Zhang X., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024, 63, 202414417; - PubMed
    2. b) Sendeku M. G., Shifa T. A., Dajan F. T., Ibrahim K. B., Wu B., Yang Y., Moretti E., Vomiero A., Wang F., Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2308101; - PubMed
    3. c) Wang Q., Ren L., Zhang J., Chen X., Chen C., Zhang F., Wang S., Chen J., Wei J., Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2301543;
    4. d) Li L., Luo Q., Wang Y., Zhang X., Wen Y., Wang N., AlShahrani T., Ma S., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202424395. - PubMed
    1. a) Segev G., Beeman J. W., Greenblatt J. B., Sharp I. D., Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 1115; - PubMed
    2. b) Flores‐Diaz N., De Rossi F., Das A., Deepa M., Brunetti F., Freitag M., Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 9327; - PMC - PubMed
    3. c) Zhao J., Zhang H., Sun X., Hao S., Zhao P., Zhu X., Dong S., J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 600.
    1. Liu S., Wu L., Tang D., Xue J., Dang K., He H., Bai S., Ji H., Chen C., Zhang Y., Zhao J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 23849. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources