Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul;42(7):3111-3140.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03220-9. Epub 2025 May 19.

Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2024: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials

Affiliations
Review

Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2024: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials

Patrick Savage et al. Adv Ther. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: In 2024, numerous key clinical trials in the field of clinical cardiology have been published or presented at major international conferences. This review seeks to collate and summarise these trials and reflect on their clinical context.

Methods: The authors evaluated all clinical trials presented at major cardiology conferences during 2024 with a focus on clinical trials which would influence and/or change current clinical practice. We reviewed clinical trials presented at all major international conferences including the American College of Cardiology (ACC), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EuroPCR), European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT), American Heart Association (AHA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), TVT-The Heart Summit (TVT) and Cardiovascular Research Technologies (CRT). Trials considered to have highest impact and/or broad relevance across the field of clinical cardiology, with a high likelihood to change or impact upon clinical practice were included.

Results: Over 90 key cardiology clinical trials were identified across the spectrum of clinical cardiology. Important updates in percutaneous coronary intervention were reviewed including new ESC guidance and several key trials in the field of coronary physiology (FAVOR III), drug-coated balloons (REGCAGE-FREE, AGENT-IDE), shock, and acute coronary syndromes (SENIOR-RITA, DanGer-Shock). Structural trials included major updates in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) from EARLY-TAVR, TAVR-UNLOAD and NOTION 3, as well as seminal trials in tricuspid (TRISCEND II) and mitral intervention (MATTERHORN). Key updates in preventative cardiology included new data in lipoprotein (a) pharmacotherapy, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol reduction and hypertension management (BPROAD, BedMed, KRAKEN), as well as several key trials in heart failure (SUMMIT, FINEARTS) hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (SEQUOIA-HCM) and cardiac amyloid (HELIOS-B).

Conclusion: The review presents a concise summary of the key clinical cardiology trials published or presented during the past year and should be of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of cardiology.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndromes; Cardiology; Clinical trials; Electrophysiology; Heart failure; Intervention; Prevention; Structural.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Ian Menown has received grants to institution, honoraria and/or conference sponsorship from Biosensors and Novartis. Ian Menown is an editorial board member of Advances in Therapy. Ian Menown was not involved in the selection of peer reviewers for the manuscript nor any of the subsequent editorial decisions. Patrick Savage, Michael Campbell, Daniel McElhatton and Meadhbh Hogg have nothing to disclose. Ethical Approval: This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not involve any new studies of human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image of the Pi-Cardia ShortCut™ device, a novel dedicated transcatheter device designed to modify aortic valve leaflets by mechanical splitting [47]. Image supplied with permission from Pi-Cardia
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Central illustration from Greene et al. [90] demonstrating US HF registry data of patients hospitalised with new HFrEF from 2016 to 2023. a Proportion of patients eligible for quadruple therapy. b HF medication prescribed on discharge. c Estimated reduction in all-cause mortality from addition of GDMT in eligible patients. Image reprinted under Creative Commons CC-BY-NC open access agreement, with permission from Oxford University Press. ACEi angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ARB angiotensin receptor blocker, ARNI angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor, BB beta-blocker, GDMT guideline-directed medical therapy, MRA mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, RASi renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors, SGLT2i sodium–glucose cotransporter 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Central illustration from Schubert et al. [93] demonstrating the superiority of early and sustained reduction in non-HDL vs. other strategies (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74–0.86). Image reprinted under Creative Commons CC-BY-NC open access agreement, with permission from Elseveir. CI confidence interval, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein, HR hazard ratio, MACE major adverse cardiovascular events, MI myocardial infarction

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes: developed by the task force for the management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European society of cardiology (ESC) endorsed by the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3415–537. - PubMed
    1. Mack MJ, Fullerton DA, Fann JI. The answers you get depend on the questions you ask: insights from the recent EXCEL trial controversy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111(6):1743–5. - PubMed
    1. Sabatine MS, Bergmark BA, Murphy SA, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2021;398(10318):2247–57. - PubMed
    1. Kunadian V, Mossop H, Shields C, et al. Invasive treatment strategy for older patients with myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(18):1673–84. - PubMed
    1. Campo G, Böhm F, Engstrøm T, et al. Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in older patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: an individual patient meta-analysis. Circulation. 2024;150(19):1508–16. - PubMed