Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jan-Dec:24:15330338251341431.
doi: 10.1177/15330338251341431. Epub 2025 May 19.

Prognostic Significance of Dynamic Lymphocyte Changes in Esophageal Cancer Patients Receiving Fluorouracil-Cisplatin Combined with Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prognostic Significance of Dynamic Lymphocyte Changes in Esophageal Cancer Patients Receiving Fluorouracil-Cisplatin Combined with Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cong Zhang et al. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

IntroductionChemoradiotherapy (CRT) is important to the esophageal cancer (EC) management. However, the predictive value of lymphocyte-related parameters, such as lymphocyte count (L), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), is not yet fully understood. Moreover, chemotherapy agents like fluorouracil and cisplatin may have an impact on lymphocyte dynamics. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the prognostic value of these parameters in EC patients undergoing concurrent CRT (eg, radiotherapy combined with fluorouracil and cisplatin), particularly in the context of specific chemotherapy regimens.MethodsElectronic databases were comprehensively searched up to September 2023 for research that assesses the prognostic role of lymphocyte-related indicators in EC patients undergoing CRT. Combined Hazard Ratios (HR) were estimated with a random-effects model, supplemented by meta-regression and subgroup analyses for enhanced insights.ResultsOf the 41 studies selected for qualitative evaluation, 22 were eligible for meta-analysis. These results revealed that increased pre-NLR (HR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.55-2.26), lower pre-LMR (HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.36-2.77), lower dur-L (HR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.28-1.90), and higher post-NLR (HR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.08-3.51) predicted poorer overall survival (OS). Lower pre-LMR (HR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.14-2.65) and lower dur-L (HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.14-1.69) were significant predictors of worse progression-free survival (PFS). The predominant chemotherapy regimen analyzed was fluorouracil combined with cisplatin, which significantly influenced lymphocyte counts and ratios during treatment.ConclusionsOur meta-analysis indicates that pre-treatment NLR, pre-treatment LMR, during-treatment L, and post-treatment NLR are valuable prognostic biomarkers for EC undergoing CRT, particularly in those treated with fluorouracil and cisplatin. Further investigations are warranted to explore their prognostic implications and therapeutic potential.

Keywords: chemoradiotherapy (CRT); dynamic lymphocyte change; esophageal cancer; meta-analysis; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA Diagram Showing Selection of Articles for Review.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Meta-Analysis of Impact of Lymphocyte-Related Parameters on OS. A Meta-Analysis of Pre-NLR for OS; B Meta-Analysis of Pre-LMR for OS; C Meta-Analysis of dur-L for OS; D Meta-Analysis of Post-NLR for OS; E Meta-Analysis of Pre-L for OS.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Meta-Analysis of Impact of Lymphocyte-Related Parameters on PFS. A Meta-Analysis of Pre-LMR for PFS; B Meta-Analysis of Dur-L for PFS; C Meta-Analysis of Pre-NLR for PFS; D Meta-Analysis of Pre-L for PFS.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Graphical Abstract of the Association Between Lymphocyte-Related Parameters and EC Prognosis. Abbreviations: RT = radiotherapy; 5-FU = fluorouracil; CDDP = cisplatin.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lagergren J, Smyth E, Cunningham D, Lagergren P. Oesophageal cancer. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2383–2396. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31462-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu M, Yang W, Guo C, et al. Effectiveness of endoscopic screening on esophageal cancer incidence and mortality: A 9-year report of the endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer in China (ESECC) randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(14):1655–1664. doi:10.1200/jco.23.01284 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeon WJ, Park D, Al-Manaseer F, et al. Survival and treatment patterns in stage II to III esophageal cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(10):e2440568. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40568 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoeppner J, Brunner T, Schmoor C, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy or preoperative chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(4):323–335. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2409408 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yao Y, Lu J, Qin Z, et al. High-dose versus standard-dose radiotherapy in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for inoperable esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2023;184:109700. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109700 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources