Validation of two plasma multimetabolite signatures for patients at risk of or with suspected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (METAPAC): a prospective, multicentre, investigator-masked, enrichment design, phase 4 diagnostic study
- PMID: 40388948
- DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00056-1
Validation of two plasma multimetabolite signatures for patients at risk of or with suspected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (METAPAC): a prospective, multicentre, investigator-masked, enrichment design, phase 4 diagnostic study
Abstract
Background: Earlier diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is key to improving overall survival in patients with this hard-to-treat cancer. We independently validated two previously identified plasma-based metabolic signatures for exclusion of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in cohorts with an increased annual risk.
Methods: The METAPAC study was a prospective, multicentre, investigator-masked, enrichment design, phase 4 trial done in 23 centres in Germany. Patients with pancreatic lesions identified by diagnostic imaging that required further diagnostic assessment were recruited and followed up for 24 months. Targeted quantitative plasma metabolite analysis was done on a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry platform. The improved metabolic (i-Metabolic) signature consisted of 12 analytes plus carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, and the minimalistic metabolic (m-Metabolic) signature consisted of four analytes plus CA 19-9. The primary endpoint of the study was the exclusion of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with an 85% specificity and the highest possible diagnostic accuracy. All statistical analyses were done per protocol. This study is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00010866).
Findings: Between Sept 9, 2016, and April 8, 2022, 1370 patients with CT-identified pancreatic lesions necessitating further diagnostic assessment were screened, of whom 1129 patients (489 with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 640 controls) were included in the primary analysis (median age 67 years [IQR 58-75]; 556 [49%] female, 572 [51%] male). The control group consisted of high-risk individuals with acute pancreatitis (11 [1%] of 1129 participants), chronic pancreatitis (113 [10%]), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (232 [21%]), cystic lesions other than intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (271 [24%]), and metastases of extrapancreatic origin (13 [1%]). The i-Metabolic signature detected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0·846 (95% CI 0·842-0·849), specificity of 90·4% (89·8-91·1), sensitivity of 67·5% (66·9-68·0), and balanced accuracy of 80·5% (80·2-80·8), compared with CA 19-9 alone (AUC 0·799 [0·797-0·802], p<0·0001; specificity 79·1% [78·7-79·4]; sensitivity 81·8% [81·5-82·0]; balanced accuracy 80·6% [80·4-80·9]). The m-Metabolic signature detected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with an AUC of 0·846 (95% CI 0·842-0·849; p<0·0001 vs CA 19-9 alone), specificity of 93·6% (93·1-94·0), sensitivity of 59·9% (59·3-60·4), and accuracy of 79·0% (78·8-79·2). In a population of 242 individuals with new-onset diabetes (three cases of incident pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma), the m-Metabolic signature (without CA 19-9) significantly discriminated patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from those without (p=0·038). AUC, specificity, and sensitivity remained constant after random bootstrapping for a prevalence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between 1% and 20%.
Interpretation: Two plasma-based metabolic signatures showed significant improvement in performance compared with CA 19-9 alone in excluding pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a prospective real-world cohort. These findings could offer a surveillance tool in patients with an annual risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of 1% to reduce unnecessary invasive procedures and facilitate earlier detection of resectable disease.
Funding: Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Germany).
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests UMM declares grants from DFG (MA 4115/3-1) and DKH (70115409), and patent applications related to the topic of this Article. OS declares travel, accommodations, and expenses for the ESMO GI Meeting, not related to this publication. RG declares honoraria from Thieme Verlag, Mylan Germany, Barmherzige Brüder Trier, Verein VHL betroffener Familien, and Sana Klinikum Hof. JPN declares grants from Stiftung Deutsche Krebshilfe, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Heidelberger Stiftung Chirurgie, and Dietmar Hopp Stiftung; membership of the BioNTech advisory board on BNT321; and a patent pending for Metavert. GB declares funding from DFG (BE 63951 1/1) and MCSP LMU Munich; and honararia from Falk Foundation, Amgen, and Nordmark. SB reports honoraria from Celgene, Servier, and MSD; consulting or advisory roles for Celgene, Servier, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, and Otsuka Pharma; and travel, accommodations, and expenses from Lilly. FF declares honoraria and travel, accommodations, and expenses from Nordmark Pharma. BK reports patents or patent applications related to the topic of this Article (WO2011151252A2: Means and methods for diagnosing pancreatic cancer in a subject; WO2013079594A1: Device and methods to diagnose pancreatic cancer; WO2015091962A1: Means and methods for diagnosing pancreatic cancer in a subject based on a metabolite panel; WO2016207391A1: Means and methods for diagnosing pancreatic cancer in a subject based on a biomarker panel; WO2019121942A1: Methods for diagnosing pancreatic cancer). BK was employed by Metanomics Health. MML declares research support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe/Mildred Scheel Stiftung, Krupp Foundation, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), European Union (FP7, EFRE, ESF, and Horizon 20/20), the State Ministry of Education and Research Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, and State Ministry of Economics MV; patents or patent applications with AstraZeneca, Gothenburg and Metanomics Health, Berlin, and Pancreomics; a patent application related to the present work; consulting fees from Solvay, Axcan, AbbVie, Abbott, Mylan, Nordmark, AstraZeneca, Centogene, Roche, Fractyl, ISIS, Ionis, KMG Kliniken; speakers bureaus for Falk Foundation, Roche, Menarini, Abbott, AbbVie, Mylan, and Nordmark; and unrestricted educational grants from Solvay, AstraZeneca, Altana-Nycomed, Lilly, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Boston-Scientific, Cook, Olympus, and Pentax. JM declares travel grants and speaker's honoraria from Falk Foundation; patents and patent applications (WO 2011/151252; PCT/EP2012/073965 pending; US Ser No 13/701302 pending; KR 12/7034115 pending; JP 12/091096 pending; IN 12/002796/MUMNP pending; AU, BR, CA 2800023, CN, EP 11724588 IL pending); and a patent application related to present work. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
A plasma-based multimetabolite biomarker for early detection of pancreatic cancer.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul;10(7):607-609. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00089-5. Epub 2025 May 16. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025. PMID: 40388949 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
