Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 20;15(1):97.
doi: 10.1038/s41408-025-01287-9.

Genomic and transcriptomic determinants of clinical outcomes in patients with AML and DNMT3A mutations

Affiliations

Genomic and transcriptomic determinants of clinical outcomes in patients with AML and DNMT3A mutations

Sao-Chih Ni et al. Blood Cancer J. .

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and DNMT3A mutations (DNMT3Amut) are considered to carry intermediate risk under the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN-2022) classification in the absence of other co-mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities. However, this group is highly heterogeneous. In this study, the genomic and transcriptomic features influencing outcomes in DNMT3A-mutated AML were examined in a cohort of 884 patients with AML receiving standard chemotherapy. Stratification by NPM1 and FLT3-ITD status revealed worse survival among patients with NPM1 mutations and wild-type FLT3-ITD (NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt) than patients in the ELN-2022 favorable risk group. The other three subgroups (NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDmut, NPM1wt/FLT3-ITDmut, and NPM1wt/FLT3-ITDwt) exhibited worse prognoses than patients in the ELN-2022 intermediate risk group. Additionally, the presence of TET2mut in patients with AML and DNMT3Amut/NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt led to reclassification from favorable risk to intermediate risk in the ELN-2022. RNA-sequencing analysis revealed a distinct transcriptomic profile in patients with TET2mut, highlighting the enrichment of leukemic stem cell signatures and dendritic cell migration, with MMP14, CD200, and CT45A5 identified as key differentially expressed genes. In conclusion, co-mutation patterns strongly affected AML outcomes in patients with DNMT3Amut. Patients with TET2mut constituted a unique subgroup within the ELN-2022 favorable DNMT3Amut/NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt group, characterized by distinct transcriptomic features and an unfavorable prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Survival outcomes in patients with DNMT3Amut.
A Comparison of Kaplan–Meier survival curves for OS and EFS among patients with AML stratified according to ELN-2022 risk groups (favorable, intermediate, adverse) and DNMT3A mutation status. OS and EFS for the DNMT3Amut group closely aligned with those of the ELN-2022 intermediate risk group. B DNMT3Amut were associated with significantly worse OS and EFS than DNMT3Awt.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Prevalence and prognostic implications of concurrent mutations in patients with DNMT3Amut.
A Oncoprint of recurrent genetic mutations in patients with DNMT3Amut and AML. Colored bars represent mutations, categorized according to functional gene classes. B Prevalence of concurrent mutations in patients with DNMT3Amut and DNMT3Awt. Mutations observed in at least 1% of patients in one subgroup are displayed. Significant differences between DNMT3Amut and DNMT3Awt groups are marked as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. C OS and EFS of patients with DNMT3Amut stratified according to NPM1 and FLT3-ITD status. Patients with NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt exhibited significantly better OS and EFS than those in other groups. D OS and EFS in the DNMT3Amut/NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt group, stratified according to concurrent genetic mutations: TET2, IDH2, signaling pathway mutations (PTPN11, FLT3-TKD, and NRAS), and total subgroup patients. The worst outcomes were observed in the DNMT3Amut/NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt/TET2mut subgroup. E OS and EFS comparison between the DNMT3Amut/NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt/TET2mut subgroup and ELN-2022 favorable risk group. Worse outcomes were observed in the DNMT3Amut/NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt/TET2mut subgroup. F OS and EFS comparison between the DNMT3Amut/NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt/TET2wt subgroup and ELN-2022 intermediate risk group. Better outcomes were observed in the DNMT3Amut/NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt/TET2wt subgroup.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Comparison of transcriptional signatures between patients with DNMT3Amut and DNMT3Awt.
A Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of patients with DNMT3Amut and DNMT3Awt patients, with the major upregulated and downregulated DEGs displayed. Colors represent normalized gene expression values. B Volcano plot comparison of all RNA-seq genes between patients with DNMT3Amut and DNMT3Awt. Positive (logFC > 0) and negative (logFC < 0) fold changes indicate upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively, in patients with DNMT3Amut. C, D Bubble plots illustrating a comparison of enriched and depleted MSigDB CGP and Hallmark gene sets between patients with DNMT3Amut and DNMT3Awt. Bubble size represents gene counts, and colors indicate statistical significance. E Gene Set Enrichment Analysis plots displaying overrepresentation of immune gene set signatures within the DNMT3Amut transcriptome. F Venn diagram of DEGs identified in initial and updated comparisons between patients with DNMT3Amut and DNMT3Awt. An initial analysis included RNA-seq data from 80 patients with DNMT3Amut and 184 with DNMT3Awt and normal karyotypes. In an updated analysis, a subset of 63 DNMT3Amut patients with normal karyotypes were compared with the original 184 patients with DNMT3Awt.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Differential transcriptional signatures between patients with TET2mut and TET2wt within the DNMT3Amut/NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt subgroup.
A Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of TET2mut and TET2wt patients within the DNMT3Amut/NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt subgroup, displaying the top upregulated and downregulated DEGs. Colors represented normalized gene expression values. B Number of upregulated and downregulated DEGs identified through comparison of transcriptomes in patients with AML with and without TET2, FLT3-TKD, IDH2, NRAS or any other co-mutations. Bubble plots illustrating enriched and depleted MSigDB Hallmark (C) and CGP and Gene Ontology Biological Processes gene sets (D) between patients with TET2mut and TET2wt in the DNMT3Amut/NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt subgroup. Bubble size represents gene counts, and color indicates statistical significance. E Gene Set Enrichment Analysis plots indicating enrichment of LSC and immune gene set signatures within the TET2mut transcriptome. F, G Volcano plot of DEGs with genes downregulated (logFC < 0) and upregulated (logFC > 0) in patients with DNMT3Amut/NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwt based on TET2 mutation status. Key DEGs are highlighted in a heat map, with colors representing normalized gene expression values.

References

    1. Ley TJ, Ding L, Walter MJ, McLellan MD, Lamprecht T, Larson DE, et al. DNMT3A Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2424–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hou HA, Kuo YY, Liu CY, Chou WC, Lee MC, Chen CY, et al. DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: stability during disease evolution and clinical implications. Blood. 2012;119:559–68. - PubMed
    1. Gaidzik VI, Schlenk RF, Paschka P, Stölzle A, Späth D, Kuendgen A, et al. Clinical impact of DNMT3A mutations in younger adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results of the AML Study Group (AMLSG). Blood. 2013;121:4769–77. - PubMed
    1. Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, Gaidzik VI, Paschka P, Roberts ND, et al. Genomic Classification and Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2209–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thol F, Damm F, Lüdeking A, Winschel C, Wagner K, Morgan M, et al. Incidence and Prognostic Influence of DNMT3A Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2889–96. - PubMed