Generational Differences in Audiometric and Self-Reported Hearing and Hearing Aid Use
- PMID: 40389680
- DOI: 10.1007/s10162-025-00993-2
Generational Differences in Audiometric and Self-Reported Hearing and Hearing Aid Use
Abstract
Purpose: Birth cohort differences capture secular trends in population health. We aimed to determine birth cohort differences, defined by generation, in hearing-related outcomes.
Methods: Participants were from a community-based cohort study. Generation was classified according to birth year: Greatest (1901-1924), Silent (1925-1945), Baby Boom (1946-1964), Generation X (1965-1980), or Millennial (1981-1996) and Gen Z (1997-2012). Primary outcomes were audiometric hearing loss, defined as a worse ear pure-tone average (PTA) of thresholds at frequencies 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz > 25 dB HL, and self-reported hearing difficulty, defined as a score ≥ 6 on the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory (RHHI). Analyses focused on hearing aid use included only participants with audiometric hearing loss. We used multivariable adjusted logistic regression models to evaluate associations between generation and each outcome. Models were stratified to sex when there was evidence of effect modification.
Results: This cross-sectional study included 1554 participants (mean age 63.7 [SD 14.4] years; 56.8% female, 20.0% racial Minority). The prevalence of audiometric hearing loss, self-reported hearing difficulty, and hearing aid use (among participants with audiometric hearing loss) was 48.9%, 48.8%, and 22.0%, respectively. Generation was associated with audiometric hearing loss in the entire sample and males only. Generation was not consistently associated with self-reported hearing difficulty or hearing aid use.
Conclusion: More recent generations had lower prevalence of audiometric hearing loss. There were no generational differences in self-reported hearing difficulty or hearing aid use. Secular hearing-related trends can inform accurate projections of the burden of hearing loss and health care utilization.
Keywords: Aging; Birth cohort; Cohort studies; Cross-sectional studies; Epidemiology; Hearing loss.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics Approval: All protocols for this study were approved by the MUSC Institutional Review Board (approval ID: E-607R) and data were collected under informed written consent. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Agreement between audiometric hearing loss and self-reported hearing difficulty on the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory differs by demographic factors.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 Jul 10;78(8):529-535. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-222143. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024. PMID: 38760153 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of self-reported hearing difficulty on the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and associated factors.BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 12;24(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04901-w. BMC Geriatr. 2024. PMID: 38867166 Free PMC article.
-
The Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Pure-Tone Average Predict Hearing Aid Use Equally Well.Am J Audiol. 2023 Dec 29;33(1):1-10. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJA-23-00213. Online ahead of print. Am J Audiol. 2023. PMID: 38157291 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of and Characteristics Associated With Self-reported Good Hearing in a Population With Elevated Audiometric Thresholds.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jul 1;145(7):626-633. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.1020. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019. PMID: 31169892 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of Childhood Hearing Loss and Secular Trends: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Acad Pediatr. 2019 Jul;19(5):504-514. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Mar 11. Acad Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 30872125
References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous