Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 19.
doi: 10.1007/s10162-025-00993-2. Online ahead of print.

Generational Differences in Audiometric and Self-Reported Hearing and Hearing Aid Use

Affiliations

Generational Differences in Audiometric and Self-Reported Hearing and Hearing Aid Use

Lauren K Dillard et al. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Birth cohort differences capture secular trends in population health. We aimed to determine birth cohort differences, defined by generation, in hearing-related outcomes.

Methods: Participants were from a community-based cohort study. Generation was classified according to birth year: Greatest (1901-1924), Silent (1925-1945), Baby Boom (1946-1964), Generation X (1965-1980), or Millennial (1981-1996) and Gen Z (1997-2012). Primary outcomes were audiometric hearing loss, defined as a worse ear pure-tone average (PTA) of thresholds at frequencies 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz > 25 dB HL, and self-reported hearing difficulty, defined as a score ≥ 6 on the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory (RHHI). Analyses focused on hearing aid use included only participants with audiometric hearing loss. We used multivariable adjusted logistic regression models to evaluate associations between generation and each outcome. Models were stratified to sex when there was evidence of effect modification.

Results: This cross-sectional study included 1554 participants (mean age 63.7 [SD 14.4] years; 56.8% female, 20.0% racial Minority). The prevalence of audiometric hearing loss, self-reported hearing difficulty, and hearing aid use (among participants with audiometric hearing loss) was 48.9%, 48.8%, and 22.0%, respectively. Generation was associated with audiometric hearing loss in the entire sample and males only. Generation was not consistently associated with self-reported hearing difficulty or hearing aid use.

Conclusion: More recent generations had lower prevalence of audiometric hearing loss. There were no generational differences in self-reported hearing difficulty or hearing aid use. Secular hearing-related trends can inform accurate projections of the burden of hearing loss and health care utilization.

Keywords: Aging; Birth cohort; Cohort studies; Cross-sectional studies; Epidemiology; Hearing loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics Approval: All protocols for this study were approved by the MUSC Institutional Review Board (approval ID: E-607R) and data were collected under informed written consent. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Goman AM, Reed NS, Lin FR (2017) Addressing estimated hearing loss in adults in 2060. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143:733–734 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Ciorba A, Bianchini C, Pelucchi S, Pastore A (2012) The impact of hearing loss on the quality of life of elderly adults. Clin Interv Aging 7:159–163 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Sharma RK, Chern A, Golub JS (2021) Age-related hearing loss and the development of cognitive impairment and late-life depression: a scoping overview. Semin Hear 42:10–25 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS et al (1998) Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin: The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol 148:879–886 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Nash SD, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R et al (2011) The prevalence of hearing impairment and associated risk factors: the Beaver Dam Offspring Study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:432–439 - PubMed - PMC - DOI

LinkOut - more resources