Generational Differences in Audiometric and Self-Reported Hearing and Hearing Aid Use
- PMID: 40389680
- PMCID: PMC12411394
- DOI: 10.1007/s10162-025-00993-2
Generational Differences in Audiometric and Self-Reported Hearing and Hearing Aid Use
Abstract
Purpose: Birth cohort differences capture secular trends in population health. We aimed to determine birth cohort differences, defined by generation, in hearing-related outcomes.
Methods: Participants were from a community-based cohort study. Generation was classified according to birth year: Greatest (1901-1924), Silent (1925-1945), Baby Boom (1946-1964), Generation X (1965-1980), or Millennial (1981-1996) and Gen Z (1997-2012). Primary outcomes were audiometric hearing loss, defined as a worse ear pure-tone average (PTA) of thresholds at frequencies 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz > 25 dB HL, and self-reported hearing difficulty, defined as a score ≥ 6 on the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory (RHHI). Analyses focused on hearing aid use included only participants with audiometric hearing loss. We used multivariable adjusted logistic regression models to evaluate associations between generation and each outcome. Models were stratified to sex when there was evidence of effect modification.
Results: This cross-sectional study included 1554 participants (mean age 63.7 [SD 14.4] years; 56.8% female, 20.0% racial Minority). The prevalence of audiometric hearing loss, self-reported hearing difficulty, and hearing aid use (among participants with audiometric hearing loss) was 48.9%, 48.8%, and 22.0%, respectively. Generation was associated with audiometric hearing loss in the entire sample and males only. Generation was not consistently associated with self-reported hearing difficulty or hearing aid use.
Conclusion: More recent generations had lower prevalence of audiometric hearing loss. There were no generational differences in self-reported hearing difficulty or hearing aid use. Secular hearing-related trends can inform accurate projections of the burden of hearing loss and health care utilization.
Keywords: Aging; Birth cohort; Cohort studies; Cross-sectional studies; Epidemiology; Hearing loss.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics Approval: All protocols for this study were approved by the MUSC Institutional Review Board (approval ID: E-607R) and data were collected under informed written consent. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS et al (1998) Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin: The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol 148:879–886 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- F32 DC021078/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- P50 DC 000422/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- C06 RR14516/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- T32 DC014435/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR001450/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- C06 RR014516/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- P50 DC000422/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- F32 DC021078/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- T32 DC014435/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- P50 DC 000422/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR001450/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- C06 RR14516/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous