Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;22(5):e70181.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.70181.

A Scoping Review to Identify Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Biomarkers Reported in the Literature to Be Indicative of Biofilm in Chronic Wounds

Affiliations

A Scoping Review to Identify Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Biomarkers Reported in the Literature to Be Indicative of Biofilm in Chronic Wounds

John D Ivory et al. Int Wound J. 2025 May.

Abstract

The objective of this review was to identify clinical signs/symptoms reported in the literature to be indicative of biofilm in chronic wounds. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews, and the Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Synthesis manual guided review conduct. Any article/study type reporting signs/symptoms of biofilm in adults with venous, diabetic, pressure and/or mixed arterial/venous ulcers was eligible. Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL and the Bielefeld Academic Search Engine were searched. Titles/abstracts and full-text articles were screened against eligibility criteria. One-hundred and eleven reports of 109 articles were included. They provided 830 accounts of clinical signs/ symptoms being indicative of biofilm. These were categorised into 26 statements. Visual indicators such as a shiny, slimy layer on a non-healing wound surface quickly reforming in the absence of frequent cleansing or debridement represented 24% of accounts, followed by failed response to antimicrobial therapies (15%), and failure of wound to close or progress to healing despite optimal management strategies (13%). Wound duration > 6 weeks and extreme tolerance to host defences represented 1% of accounts. Clinical signs/symptoms are recommended and used as indicators of biofilm presence in chronic wounds but with little supporting validation data.

Keywords: biofilms; chronic wounds; scoping review; signs and symptoms; wound healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flow diagram of search results (inception to July 6th 2023) [47].
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Included reports n (%) by year of publication.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Included reports n (%) by study design/article type.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Included reports n (%) by wound aetiology.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Signs and symptoms reported to be indicative of biofilm in chronic wounds n (%) by study design/article type.

References

    1. Guo S. and Dipietro L. A., “Factors Affecting Wound Healing,” Journal of Dental Research 89, no. 3 (2010): 219–229. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frykberg R. G. and Banks J., “Challenges in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds,” Advances in Wound Care 4, no. 9 (2015): 560–582. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsourdi E., Barthel A., Rietzsch H., Reichel A., and Bornstein S. R., “Current Aspects in the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Chronic Wounds in Diabetes Mellitus,” BioMed Research International 2013 (2013): 385641. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falanga V., Isseroff R. R., Soulika A. M., et al., “Chronic Wounds,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers 8, no. 1 (2022): 50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martinengo L., Olsson M., Bajpai R., et al., “Prevalence of Chronic Wounds in the General Population: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Observational Studies,” Annals of Epidemiology 29 (2019): 8–15. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources