Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;9(6):937-946.
doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02705-8. Epub 2025 May 19.

Aridity modulates grassland biomass responses to combined drought and nutrient addition

Affiliations

Aridity modulates grassland biomass responses to combined drought and nutrient addition

V F Bondaruk et al. Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Plant biomass tends to increase under nutrient addition and decrease under drought. Biotic and abiotic factors influence responses to both, making the combined impact of nutrient addition and drought difficult to predict. Using a globally distributed network of manipulative field experiments, we assessed grassland aboveground biomass response to both drought and increased nutrient availability at 26 sites across nine countries. Overall, drought reduced biomass by 19% and nutrient addition increased it by 24%, resulting in no net impact under combined drought and nutrient addition. Among the plant functional groups, only graminoids responded positively to nutrients during drought. However, these general responses depended on local conditions, especially aridity. Nutrient effects were stronger in arid grasslands and weaker in humid regions and nitrogen-rich soils, although nutrient addition alleviated drought effects the most in subhumid sites. Biomass responses were weaker with higher precipitation variability. Biomass increased more with increased nutrient availability and declined more with drought at high-diversity sites than at low-diversity sites. Our findings highlight the importance of local abiotic and biotic conditions in predicting grassland responses to anthropogenic nutrient and climate changes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Naumann, G. et al. Global changes in drought conditions under different levels of warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 3285–3296 (2018). - DOI
    1. Seabloom, E. W. et al. Increasing effects of chronic nutrient enrichment on plant diversity loss and ecosystem productivity over time. Ecology 102, e03218 (2020).
    1. DeMalach, N., Zaady, E. & Kadmon, R. Contrasting effects of water and nutrient additions on grassland communities: a global meta‐analysis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 983–992 (2017). - DOI
    1. Yahdjian, L., Gherardi, L. & Sala, O. E. Nitrogen limitation in arid-subhumid ecosystems: a meta-analysis of fertilization studies. J. Arid. Environ. 75, 675–680 (2011). - DOI
    1. Knapp, AlanK. et al. Pushing precipitation to the extremes in distributed experiments: recommendations for simulating wet and dry years. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 1774–1782 (2017).

LinkOut - more resources