Environmental DNA (eDNA) collection techniques across diverse ecosystems: a mini-review of promising new tools for eDNA metabarcoding
- PMID: 40389770
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-025-36519-9
Environmental DNA (eDNA) collection techniques across diverse ecosystems: a mini-review of promising new tools for eDNA metabarcoding
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis has significantly transformed the way biodiversity assessment and monitoring are conducted in many environments. This review study synthesizes findings from multiple studies to provide a comprehensive overview of eDNA collection strategies in diverse settings. The review examines the techniques used for sampling eDNA in water, air, soil, sediment, and coral reef ecosystems. Water filtration, sediment sampling, and passive sampling devices are commonly used methods for collecting eDNA in aquatic environments. These techniques provide non-invasive ways to identify and track aquatic organisms, offering vital information about the interactions within the community and the global distribution of species. Similarly, the use of airborne eDNA sampling techniques is becoming increasingly promising for evaluating biodiversity on land, although there is room for improvement. Soil eDNA extraction techniques involve the use of soil coring to collect samples, followed by DNA extraction from these samples, and the application of metabarcoding methods. These techniques allow for thorough investigations of biodiversity in the soil. Specialized techniques for collecting eDNA are required for coral reef ecosystems due to their intricate habitat structure and fluctuating water conditions. The importance of choosing appropriate techniques for eDNA collection based on ecosystem parameters and research objectives is emphasized by comparative analysis. This mini-review consolidates knowledge from a selected body of recent studies and serves as a helpful resource for scholars and practitioners involved in biodiversity monitoring and conservation across diverse ecosystems.
Keywords: Biodiversity monitoring; Metabarcoding; Passive method; Rapid method; eDNA.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations: Ethical approval. Not applicable. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: The authors have approved the submission of the final version of the article. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
References
-
- Alexander JB, Bunce M, White N, Wilkinson SP, Adam AA, Berry T, ... Richards ZT (2020) Development of a multi-assay approach for monitoring coral diversity using eDNA metabarcoding. Coral Reefs 39:159–171
-
- Antony Dass M, Sherman CD, Nai YH, Ellis MR, van Oorschot RA, Durdle A (2022) Assessing the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool in the detection of human DNA in water. J Forensic Sci 67(6):2299–2307 - DOI
-
- Ardura A, Zaiko A, Martinez JL, Samulioviene A, Semenova A, Garcia-Vazquez E (2015) eDNA and specific primers for early detection of invasive species–a case study on the bivalve Rangia cuneata, currently spreading in Europe. Mar Environ Res 112:48–55 - DOI
-
- Banchi E, Ametrano CG, Tordoni E, Stanković D, Ongaro S, Tretiach M, ... Lazzarin S (2020) Environmental DNA assessment of airborne plant and fungal seasonal diversity. Sci Total Environ 738:140249
-
- Bessey C, Gao Y, Truong YB, Miller H, Jarman SN, Berry O (2022) Comparison of materials for rapid passive collection of environmental DNA. Mol Ecol Resour 22(7):2559–2572 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
