Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 19;24(1):143.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02507-1.

Household-income trajectories and mental health inequalities in Germany before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a quasi-experimental panel study

Affiliations

Household-income trajectories and mental health inequalities in Germany before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a quasi-experimental panel study

Ibrahim Demirer et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted progress toward achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being). In Germany, labor market volatility, compounded by record inflation, widened social inequalities and contributed to a gradient in mental health. This study examines the relationship between household income and mental health before, during, and after the pandemic in the German working population, addressing whether mental health burdens persisted post-pandemic.

Methods: Using the German Socioeconomic Panel (v39.0), we applied a quasi-experimental design employing a 'placebo control' approach to obtain difference-in-difference (DiD) estimates. For this purpose, we created an 'intervention' sample consisting of respondents exposed to the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 8,340, 2018-2022) and a 'placebo control' sample, consisting of respondents not exposed to the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 11,869, 2014-2018), designed to mimic the intervention sample. Sequence analysis identified six typical household income trajectories (S1-S6): high, regular, fluctuating-I-II, low and unemployed. We used estimation methods to assess the mental health impacts of these trajectories during and post-pandemic, stratified by gender.

Results: The results confirmed a strong social gradient in mental health tied to household income. For males, the COVID-19 pandemic caused a mental health decline of ~ ¼ standard deviation for trajectories reflecting regular (S2), fluctuating (S3), and low household income (S5) (e.g., S3-DiD = -2.043**), while those in high household income or unemployed trajectories were unaffected. Females experienced a more generalized mental health decline across all trajectories. Post-pandemic, mental health showed signs of recovery but did not fully return to pre-pandemic levels.

Conclusions: These findings revealed that regular and fluctuating household income trajectories (S2-S5) are particularly vulnerable to mental health impacts during crises. Females are disproportionately affected, highlighting the need for targeted public health interventions. Strengthening institutional supports, such as childcare, and addressing gender disparities can help build resilience and advance progress toward the SDGs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study databases did not include individual identifiers, so approval by the Ethics Committee was not required. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of data division and period classification for placebo control and intervention sample using the GSOEP
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportional composition of element variable in the HH-EI trajectories S1-6. Chronograms show the distributional properties of the element variable within the HH-EI trajectories for males (A-F) and females (G-L)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
DiD-estimates of HH-EI trajectories at pre-, per-, and post-COVID-19 period between intervention and control sample. DiD-estimates of Eq. 3 for males (A-C) and females (D-F)

Similar articles

References

    1. Sareen J, Afifi TO, McMillan KA, Asmundson GJG. Relationship between household income and mental disorders: findings from a population-based longitudinal study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(4):419–27. - PubMed
    1. Shields-Zeeman L, Smit F. The impact of income on mental health. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(6):e486–7. - PubMed
    1. Thomson RM, Igelström E, Purba AK, Shimonovich M, Thomson H, McCartney G, et al. How do income changes impact on mental health and wellbeing for working-age adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(6):e515–28. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol. 1989;44(3):513–24. - PubMed
    1. Pearlin LI, Bierman A. Current Issues and Future Directions in Research into the Stress Process. In: Aneshensel CS, Phelan JC, Bierman A, editors. Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2013. p. 325–40 (Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research).

LinkOut - more resources