Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024;5(3):1114.
Epub 2024 Sep 20.

Simulations-Based Least Required Sample Size and Power in Clinical Trials with Time-to-Event endpoint and Variable Hazard

Mohamed Mubasher  1 , Liang Shan  2 , Fengxia Yan  1 , Brian Rivers  3 , Fan Wu  4 , Muhammed Idris  1 , Alexander Quarshie  1 , Robert M Mayberry  1 , Elizabeth Ofili  5 , Tabia Henry Akintobi  1 , Sejong Bae  2
Affiliations

Simulations-Based Least Required Sample Size and Power in Clinical Trials with Time-to-Event endpoint and Variable Hazard

Mohamed Mubasher et al. Int J Epidemiol Public Health Res. 2024.

Abstract

Two of the pivotal design parameters for planning clinical trials with time-to-event outcome(s) are sample size and power. Attention needs to be placed on the hazard function (which characterizes the rate at which events occur and can be constant, decreasing, and/or increasing in time). This work employs simulation(s) of real scenarios of randomized studies to generate time-to-event variables with specific hazard characterization, obeying the Weibull function which accommodates variable hazard situations. Our aim is to determine the least required sample size and power values, based on simulating two independent samples of Weibull distributed responses, differing by various postulated hazard patterns (constant, decreasing, or increasing in time), different scale parameter values, and follow-up periods.

Keywords: Hazard; Simulation; Statistical Power; Time-to-event; Weibull.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Typical hazard functions of Simulated Sample size100 per group, Decreasing Hazard (shape=0.8), HR= 0.5, Follow-up=4
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Typical Survival distributions with Simulated Sample size100 per group, shape=2.0, HR= 0.5, Follow-up=4
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Typical hazard functions of Simulated Sample size 200 per group, Constant Hazard (shape=1.0), HR= 0.5, Follow-up=5
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Typical hazard functions of Simulated Sample size100 per group, Increasing Hazard (shape=2.0), HR= 0.5, Follow-up=4 Years
Figure 6:
Figure 6:
The converse is observed when evaluating changes in power as a function of scale parameters
Figure 7:
Figure 7:
It goes without saying that these observational findings require future study to substantiate.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chow S-C, Shao J, Wang H, Lokhnygina Y. Sample size calculations in clinical research, 3rd edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2017.
    1. Cox DR, Oakes D. Analysis of survival data. London UK: Chapman and Hall; 1984.
    1. Schoenfeld D The asymptotic properties of nonparametric tests for comparing survival distributions. Biometrika. 1981;68:316–319.
    1. Lachin JM. Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1981;2:93–113. - PubMed
    1. Lachin JM, Foulkes MA. Evaluation of sample size and power for analyses of survival with allowance for nonuniform patient entry, losses to follow-up, noncompliance, and stratification. Biometrics. 1986;42:507–519. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources