Patient Satisfaction After Subcuticular Sutures and Metallic Staples for Skin Closure in Caesarean Section: A Randomized Study at a Tertiary Centre
- PMID: 40390957
- PMCID: PMC12085501
- DOI: 10.1007/s13224-024-02040-1
Patient Satisfaction After Subcuticular Sutures and Metallic Staples for Skin Closure in Caesarean Section: A Randomized Study at a Tertiary Centre
Abstract
Background: A variety of materials and techniques are used for skin closure after caesarean section (CS), common ones being sutures and staples. The technique chosen should be simple, quick, painless, and provide good cosmesis with least wound complications, and there is a need to identify which provides the best outcome.
Objectives: The aim was to compare metallic surgical staples versus subcuticular sutures for skin closure after caesarean delivery in terms of wound complications, skin closure time, pain score on day 3, and patient satisfaction after 6 weeks.
Materials and methods: A total of 300 women undergoing CS with Pfannenstiel incision were randomized into two groups using sealed envelopes. Skin closure was done, and time was noted simultaneously. Wound condition and pain score were assessed on day 3 and 6 weeks post-operatively.
Results: On day 3 post-operatively, 22% patients in each group had abnormal healing. After 6 weeks, 1.37% patients with sutures and 3.44% patients with staples had abnormal healing (p value 0.39). Total 10 patients (3.33%), 5 in each group, underwent resuturing within 6 weeks post-operatively. Staples reduced skin closure time as compared to sutures (p value <0.001). Mean pain score was comparable between two groups on day 3 post-operatively (p value 0.08) and at 6 weeks (p value 0.45). Patient satisfaction score considering the appearance and comfort of scar was comparable between both groups (p value 0.25).
Conclusion: Staples and subcuticular sutures are equivalent to each other, and the choice of skin closure material is at the discretion of the surgeon.
Keywords: Caesarean section; Skin closure time; Skin staples; Subcuticular sutures; Wound complication.
© Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare no personal or financial conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD003577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 23152219 Free PMC article.
-
Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;(9):CD003577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD003577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577.pub3. PMID: 22972064 Updated.
-
Comparison of Three Techniques for Skin Closure in Caesarean Delivery (Absorbable Subcuticular Sutures, Non-absorbable Nylon Sutures, Surgical Staplers): A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Apr;75(Suppl 1):348-354. doi: 10.1007/s13224-024-01999-1. Epub 2024 Jun 13. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025. PMID: 40390946
-
Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29099149 Free PMC article.
-
Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD003577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;(9):CD003577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577.pub2. PMID: 12804476 Updated.