Evaluating pain outcomes in Chinese ophthalmology patients using the APS-POQ-R-C: a Rasch analysis
- PMID: 40391110
- PMCID: PMC12087573
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1558111
Evaluating pain outcomes in Chinese ophthalmology patients using the APS-POQ-R-C: a Rasch analysis
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-C) using Rasch analysis, to optimize the APS-POQ-R-C for effective pain assessment in Chinese postoperative ophthalmic patients.
Methods: The polytomous analysis approach of the Rasch model was used to comprehensively evaluate the applicability of the APS-POQ-R-C scale in postoperative ophthalmic patients. Using a sample of 294 valid questionnaires, multiple aspects of the scale were tested, including unidimensionality, local independence of items, reliability and separation, item fit, person-item mapping, test information function, and differential item functioning (DIF) analysis.
Results: Principal component analysis of residuals, explained common variance (0.61) and omega hierarchical (0.72) of the APS-POQ-R-C scale demonstrates essential unidimensionality. The reliability and separation of person were 0.93 and 3.64, item were 0.99 and 10.32, indicating high reliability and separation. The standardized residual correlations between items were all below 0.7, suggesting local independence. The response category functioning results recommended merging categories 8, 9, and 10. Except for item P10, most items had infit and outfit mean square (MNSQ) values within acceptable ranges, indicating good fit to the Rasch model. Item P10's MNSQ values exceeded 1.50. The person-item map indicating that item difficulty was generally higher than the mean ability of the population. The test information curve showed that the scale was most informative for individuals with higher levels of the latent traits. DIF analysis revealed slight gender-related differential functioning in items P5a, P5b, P5c, and P5d, with absolute DIF contrast greater than 0.5.
Conclusion: The APS-POQ-R-C can be used to assess postoperative pain management effectively in the study sample, with overall good psychometric properties. Further optimization is suggested, including reducing item redundancy, incorporating more simple items and considering the potential influence of gender differences on responses to the scale.
Keywords: APS-POQ-R-C scale; Rasch analysis; ophthalmic surgery; pain management; postoperative pain.
Copyright © 2025 Huang and Chen.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of a modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain.Scand J Pain. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):117-130. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0106. Scand J Pain. 2019. PMID: 30352045
-
Is the Patient Activation Measure a valid measure of osteoarthritis self-management attitudes and capabilities? Results of a Rasch analysis.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 5;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01364-6. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32370751 Free PMC article.
-
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32169070 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric evaluation of the pictorial scale of perceived movement skill competence in Chinese children: An item response theory analysis.Child Care Health Dev. 2024 Jul;50(4):e13275. doi: 10.1111/cch.13275. Child Care Health Dev. 2024. PMID: 38801211
-
Enhancing the usefulness of the Mini-BESTest for measuring dynamic balance: a Rasch validation study.Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Aug;51(4):429-37. Epub 2015 Feb 5. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015. PMID: 25653078
References
-
- Anderson L., Reilly E., Gorrell S., Schaumberg K., Anderson D. (2016). Gender-based differential item function for the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Personal. Individ. Differ. 92, 87–91. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.016 - DOI
-
- Awan H., Durrani Z. (2015). Postoperative pain management in the surgical wards of a tertiary care hospital in Peshawar. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 65, 358–361., PMID: - PubMed
-
- Baker F. (2001). The basics of item response theory. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous