Growth-friendly Technique or Posterior Spinal Fusion With T-construct Pelvic Fixation in Nonambulatory Spinal Muscular Atrophy With Severe Scoliosis
- PMID: 40391594
- DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000003008
Growth-friendly Technique or Posterior Spinal Fusion With T-construct Pelvic Fixation in Nonambulatory Spinal Muscular Atrophy With Severe Scoliosis
Abstract
Background: The surgical treatment of scoliosis in type 2 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA2) is challenging and little described in the literature due to its rarity and fragility of the patients. The aim of this study was to review the surgical strategies and outcomes in patients with SMA2 who underwent surgery for scoliosis at a French reference neuromuscular center.
Methods: All consecutive patients with genetically confirmed SMA2 who underwent spinal surgery between 2009 and 2022 at our French reference center were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into 2 groups, according to their primary surgery: either magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) or posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Demographic, respiratory, and radiologic parameters were collected preoperatively and at the latest follow-up. All complications were reported. Patients and/or caregiver-reported outcome questionnaires were also used to assess the improvement of sitting posture.
Results: Seventeen patients underwent MCGR, and 9 patients underwent PSF during the inclusion period. Mean follow-up was 5.3±1.8 years in the MGCR group, and 8.0±4.5 years in the PSF group. The average age at surgery was 9.7±1.6 years in the MCGR group and 12.6±1.7 years in the PSF group. Pelvic fixation was performed using a Tconstruct (2 sacral and 2 iliac screws). PSF was performed with all levelled pedicle screws. In the MGCR group, upper thoracic fixation was lateral ribs (n=4), vertebral on three levels (n=9), or hybrid costo-vertebral (n=4). No blood transfusion was required. No differences were found between preoperative and postoperative lung function tests for the 2 surgical procedures. The major curve correction rate was 44% in the MCGR group and 55% in the PSF group. The pelvic obliquity at last follow-up was <5 degrees in all patients. Three unplanned surgeries occurred: 1 MGCR change after lengthening and 2 PSF-one for proximal hook migration and one for infection. All patients improved their ability to sit.
Conclusion: In this series, PSF and MGCR allowed stable radiographic and respiratory results, with a reduced rate of global complications. Pelvic fixation with T-construct was a reliable and effective technique to correct pelvic obliquity in this population of patients.
Keywords: T-construct; magnetic growing rods; pelvic fixation; posterior spinal fusion; respiratory function; scoliosis; spinal muscular atrophy.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
How Does Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering Compare to Posterior Spinal Fusion for Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis? A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003575. Online ahead of print. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 40537949
-
What Are the Medium-term Reciprocal Changes in Cervical Sagittal Alignment After Posterior Correction for Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 21;483(9):1746-1758. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003448. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 40117516
-
Outcomes of Growth-Friendly Surgery and Posterior Spinal Fusion in Children With Rett Syndrome and Early Onset Scoliosis.J Pediatr Orthop. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000003086. Online ahead of print. J Pediatr Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40820925
-
Minimally invasive surgery using posterior-only Pedicle screw fixation in treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Neurosci. 2022 May;99:317-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.03.019. Epub 2022 Mar 24. J Clin Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35339852
-
Patient and surgical predictors of 3D correction in posterior spinal fusion: a systematic review.Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):1927-1946. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07708-2. Epub 2023 Apr 20. Eur Spine J. 2023. PMID: 37079078
References
-
- Mercuri E, Sumner CJ, Muntoni F, et al. Spinal muscular atrophy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8:52.
-
- Kolb SJ, Kissel JT. Spinal muscular atrophy. Neurol Clin. 2015;33:831–846.
-
- Darras BT. Spinal muscular atrophies. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015;62:743–766.
-
- Lunn MR, Wang CH. Lunn spinal muscular atrophy. Lancet. 2008;371:2120–2133.
-
- Sitas B, Hancevic M, Bilic K, et al. Risdiplam real world data—looking beyond motor neurons and motor function measures. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2024;11:75–84.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical