Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Injury: The Role of Expert Witness Testimony and a Recent Case Development
- PMID: 40392472
- DOI: 10.1007/s11673-025-10422-x
Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Injury: The Role of Expert Witness Testimony and a Recent Case Development
Abstract
The triad of clinical signs, (extensive bilateral retinal haemorrhages, subdural haematoma, and encephalopathy) is regarded by some expert witnesses as pathognomonic proof that an infant was deliberately shaken and head injured (shaken baby syndrome / abusive head injury). However, that view is controversial since scientific evidence does not support the diagnostic accuracy of the triad. In contrast to previous cases, a Victorian Supreme Court jury found an accused not guilty of homicide of a one-month-old infant afflicted with the triad. Prosecution witnesses were heavily criticized for failing to provide impartial testimony and to abide by Supreme Court expert evidence rules. We argue that there is a need to reassess the manner in which expert witness testimony is considered by the courts in shaken baby cases where injury has caused the death of the infant.
Keywords: Children; Criminal law; Expert witness testimony; Health law; Law; Shaken baby syndrome; Witness opinion.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Dr James Tibballs was a witness called by the defendants in DPP v DHT and by the coroner for the inquest into the death of Mathew Jameel.
Similar articles
-
Medical and Legal Uncertainties and Controversies in "Shaken Baby Syndrome" or Infant "Abusive Head Trauma".J Law Med. 2024 May;31(1):151-184. J Law Med. 2024. PMID: 38761395
-
Expert Witness.2024 Dec 7. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Dec 7. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 28613772 Free Books & Documents.
-
Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.Forensic Sci Rev. 2001 Jul;13(2):87-99. Forensic Sci Rev. 2001. PMID: 26256304 Review.
-
Retinodural haemorrhage of infancy, abusive head trauma, shaken baby syndrome: The continuing quest for evidence.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Mar;66(3):290-297. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15676. Epub 2023 Jun 23. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024. PMID: 37353945 Review.
-
Re-evaluation of medical findings in alleged shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma in Norwegian courts fails to support abuse diagnoses.Acta Paediatr. 2022 Apr;111(4):779-792. doi: 10.1111/apa.15956. Epub 2021 Jun 8. Acta Paediatr. 2022. PMID: 34041784
References
-
- American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2015. abusive head trauma/shaken baby syndrome-2015. https://www.aao.org/education/clinical-statement/abusive-head-traumashak... .
-
- Brook, C. 2023. Maintaining the orthodoxy and silencing dissent. In Shaken baby syndrome, investigating the abusive head trauma controversy, edited by K.A. Findley, C. Rossant, K. Sasakura, L. Schneps, W. Squier, and K. Wester, 1–10. Cambridge University Press.
-
- Brook, C., and M. Nott. 2023. Shaken baby syndrome in Australia. In Shaken baby syndrome, Investigating the abusive head trauma controversy, edited by K.A. Findley, C. Rossant, K. Sasakura, L. Schneps, W. Squier, and K. Wester, 374–382. Cambridge University Press.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources