Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;12(4):e200406.
doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200406. Epub 2025 May 20.

Assessing Commercial Tissue-Based Assays for Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders (II): Antibodies to Surface Antigens

Affiliations

Assessing Commercial Tissue-Based Assays for Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders (II): Antibodies to Surface Antigens

Claudia Papi et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Detecting neural surface antibodies (NSAbs) is essential for diagnosing autoimmune encephalitis. The recommended diagnostic strategy involves initial screening with tissue-based assays (TBAs), followed by confirmation with cell-based assays (CBAs). While specialized centers use in-house TBAs, many clinical laboratories depend on commercial TBAs, whose accuracy is yet to be fully assessed.

Methods: We selected 92 CSF and 99 serum samples from patients with autoimmune encephalitis and NSAbs confirmed by in-house TBAs and CBAs (20 samples each for AMPAR, GABAAR, GABABR, IgLON5, LGI1, NMDAR, and CASPR2; 19 for mGluR5; 17 for DPPX; and 15 for mGluR1 antibodies), along with 50 CSF and 50 serum samples from negative controls. We assessed the performance of a commercial indirect immunofluorescence (IIF)-TBA (EUROIMMUN). Slides were evaluated as "positive" or "negative" by 2 experienced investigators and 2 less experienced raters. Discordant results were re-evaluated through interrater discussion and assessed using Cohen's kappa.

Results: The experienced raters agreed on 94% (133/142) of CSF and 88% (131/149) of serum classifications (Cohen's kappa = 0.87 and 0.75, respectively, p < 0.001). Among CSF samples, 75% (106/142) were correctly identified while 19% (27/142) were misclassified (13 false positives, 14 false negatives). Among serum samples, 66% (98/149) were correctly identified while 22% (33/149) were misclassified (11 false positives, 22 false negatives). The poorest performance was seen in detecting NMDAR, GABAAR, and mGluR5 Abs, which were not identified in 5 of 10, 6 of 10, and 5 of 9 serum samples and in 4 of 10, 5 of 10, and 5 of 10 CSF samples, respectively. The overall sensitivity of the commercial IIF-TBA was 84% for CSF and 76% for serum while the specificity was 72% for CSF and 73% for serum. Less experienced raters correctly identified 69% (98/142) of CSF samples and 73% (109/149) of serum samples and misclassified 13% (18/142) of CSF samples and 11% (16/149) of serum samples, and 18% (26/142) of CSF samples and 16% (24/149) of serum samples remained discordant.

Discussion: The diagnostic performance of EUROIMMUN IIF-TBA in detecting NSAbs in autoimmune encephalitis is suboptimal. NMDAR antibodies, among the most common NSAbs, can be missed in 50% of cases. This commercial TBA should not be used alone as a screening method nor as a confirmatory technique for NSAbs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C. Papi receives research support from Spanish National Health Institute Carlos III (FIS grant PI23/01366) and 2023 EAN Research Training Fellowship. C. Milano receives research support from Spanish National Health Institute Carlos III co-funded by the European Union (Rio-Hortega grant CM24/00055). L. Marmolejo receives research support from Spanish National Health Institute Carlos III (predoctoral research grant FI24/00021). M. Spatola receives research support from La Caixa Foundation (Junior Leader) and Spanish National Health Institute Carlos III (ISCIII) and co-funded by the European Union (FIS grant PI23/01366). J. Dalmau receives research support from CaixaResearch Health 2022 (HR22-00221), Spanish National Health Institute Carlos III (ISCIII) and co-funded by the European Union (FIS grant PI23/00858), Cellex Foundation, Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (FCRB) Programa Multidisciplinar de Recerca, Generalitat de Catalunya Department of Health (SLT028/23/000071), Edmond J. Safra Foundation. He receives royalties from Euroimmun for the use of NMDA as an antibody test. He received a licensing fee from Euroimmun for the use of GABAB receptor, GABAA receptor, DPPX and IgLON5 as autoantibody tests. He has received a research grant from Sage Therapeutics. All the other authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Algorithm of the Study
CBA = cell-based assay; IIF = indirect immunofluorescence; NSAbs = neural surface antibodies; TBA = tissue-based assay.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pie Charts Showing the Percentages of True/False-Positive/Negative Results in CSF (A) and Serum (B) Samples Using EUROIMMUN IIF-TBA
IIF = indirect immunofluorescence; NSAb+ = neural surface antibody positive; NC = negative control; TBA = tissue-based assay.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Examples of NMDAR and LGI1 Antibody Staining on In-House IHC and Commercial IIF-TBA
Staining patterns of samples positive for NMDAR (left column) and LGI1 (right column) antibodies on rat hippocampus with in-house IHC and IIF-TBA. Characteristic staining patterns of NMDAR (A) and LGI1 (B) antibodies with in-house IHC. In some cases, the same recognizable typical staining pattern was observed on IIF-TBA (C, D), whereas in others, the sample was labeled as “positive” although a typical staining pattern was not observed (E, F). Examples of NMDAR (G) and LGI1 (H) antibody–positive samples with negative staining with IIF-TBA. Scale bar = 500 μm. Abs = antibodies; IHC = immunohistochemistry; IIF = indirect immunofluorescence; LGI1 = leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1; NMDAR = N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor; TBA = tissue-based assay.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Heatmaps Showing the Detailed Results for Each Sample Tested With the Commercial IIF-TBA
CSF (A, upper plot) and serum (A, lower plot) positive samples are grouped into different columns based on the specific antibody. Each sample is represented with a different color according to the results after the interrater agreement between the 2 expert raters (in green: true positive; in purple: false negative; in gray: discordant samples). CSF (B, top row) and serum (B, bottom row) negative controls (unpaired samples) are represented with different colors according to the results after the interrater agreement between the 2 expert raters (in green: true negative; in purple: false positive; in gray: discordant samples). NC = negative control; NSAb+ = neural surface antibody positive.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dalmau J, Graus F. Antibody-mediated encephalitis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):840-851. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1708712 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graus F, Titulaer MJ, Balu R, et al. A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(4):391-404. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00401-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Höftberger R, Dalmau J, Graus F. Clinical neuropathology practice guide 5-2012: updated guideline for the diagnosis of antineuronal antibodies. Clin Neuropathol. 2012;31(5):337-341. doi: 10.5414/np300545 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dalmau J, Graus F. Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis: utility and pitfalls for antibody-negative disease. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(6):529-540. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00083-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gresa-Arribas N, Titulaer MJ, Torrents A, et al. Antibody titres at diagnosis and during follow-up of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(2):167-177. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70282-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts