Conceptualising workplace loneliness: a qualitative investigation with UK workers
- PMID: 40394419
- DOI: 10.1007/s00127-025-02925-0
Conceptualising workplace loneliness: a qualitative investigation with UK workers
Abstract
Purpose: Loneliness has been identified as an important risk factor for mental health problems, and concern about its impact on workers' health and wellbeing has grown in recent years. While a body of workplace loneliness research is emerging, the degree to which existing definitions of the phenomenon reflect workers' experiences has not been investigated. This study aims to develop an evidence-based conceptualisation of workplace loneliness that can inform future research and interventions aiming to improve workers' mental health and wellbeing.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews exploring experiences of social connection, loneliness and work were conducted with a diverse sample of 31 UK-based workers. The interviews were supplemented with a social mapping task. Interview data were analysed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis. Social maps were analysed using a thematic analysis approach informed by a visual semiology framework.
Results: Three themes were identified, in which loneliness was conceptualised as disconnection from (1) colleagues, (2) one's organisation, and (3) society. Across each theme, disconnection and loneliness were experienced as an unfulfilled desire to feel that one's authentic self was understood, valued or belonged as a result of one's work or occupation.
Conclusions: Workplace loneliness comprises not only dissatisfaction with interpersonal relationships at work, but also a sense of disconnection from larger social groups and structures, particularly one's employing organisation and society as a whole. Definitions of workplace loneliness that acknowledge the role of the social and organisational context, as well as professional relationships, are needed to better reflect the lived experience of loneliness at work.
Keywords: Employment conditions; Loneliness; Psychosocial workplace exposure; Qualitative research; Work.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This project was approved by the King’s College London Research Ethics Office (HR/DP-20/21-22104). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. For the purposes of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Accepted Author Manuscript version arising from this submission. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers' experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic.PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256454. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34473755 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding and using experiences of social care to guide service improvements: translating a co-design approach from health to social care.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(27):1-84. doi: 10.3310/MYHT8970. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 39264767
-
A Blog-Based Study of Autistic Adults' Experiences of Aloneness and Connection and the Interplay with Well-Being: Corpus-Based and Thematic Analyses.Autism Adulthood. 2023 Dec 1;5(4):437-449. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0073. Epub 2023 Dec 12. Autism Adulthood. 2023. PMID: 38116056 Free PMC article.
-
New ways of working in mental health services: a qualitative, comparative case study assessing and informing the emergence of new peer worker roles in mental health services in England.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Jul. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Jul. PMID: 27466663 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Work hazards and workers' mental health: an investigation based on the fifth European Working Conditions Survey.Med Lav. 2019 Apr 19;110(2):115-129. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v110i2.7640. Med Lav. 2019. PMID: 30990473 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Park C, Majeed A, Gill H, Tamura J, Ho RC, Mansur RB et al (2020) The effect of loneliness on distinct health outcomes: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113514 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Jopling K, McClelland H, Proffitt E (2023) Loneliness at work. London: British Red Cross. https://www.example.com/loneliness-at-work.pdf . Accessed 13 December 2024
-
- Paul E, Bu F, Fancourt D (2021) Loneliness and risk for cardiovascular disease: Mechanisms and future directions. Curr Cardiol Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01495-2 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Henriksen RE, Nilsen RM, Strandberg RB (2023) Loneliness increases the risk of type 2 diabetes: A 20 year follow-up–results from the HUNT study. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05791-6 . Diabetologia
-
- Morrish N, Medina-Lara A (2021) Does unemployment lead to greater levels of loneliness? A systematic review. Soc Sci Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114339 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources