Perioperative comparison of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for complex segmentectomy of the lower lung lobe
- PMID: 40394533
- PMCID: PMC12093697
- DOI: 10.1186/s12893-025-02944-3
Perioperative comparison of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for complex segmentectomy of the lower lung lobe
Abstract
Background: Resection of basal segmentectomy through uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) is technically challenging for thoracic surgeons. Compared with multiportal VATS (M-VATS), the safety and feasibility of U-VATS for complex segmentectomy of lower lung lobe need further validation. In this study, we aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of U-VATS with M-VATS in the treatment of complex segmentectomy of lower lung lobe for stage IA lung cancer.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 168 patients (116 U-VATS and 52 M-VATS) undergoing complex lower lobe segmentectomy for stage IA NSCLC from January 2021 to May 2023. The demographics of the enrolled patients were collected and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the heterogeneity of baseline characteristics. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results: After matching, 50 cases were yielded in each group. There was no 30-day postoperative mortality and conversion to open in both groups. The U-VATS exhibited shorter postoperative hospital stays (P = 0.034) and a trend toward reduced postoperative drainage (P = 0.081) compared to the M-VATS group. Pain score on postoperative day 2 in the U-VATS group was lower than M-VATS group (P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in resection margins, operation time and postoperative complications between the two groups.
Conclusions: U-VATS provides comparable perioperative safety and efficacy to M-VATS for complex lower lobe segmentectomy, with advantages in accelerated recovery and reduced postoperative pain. U-VATS complex segmentectomy of lower lung lobe is a safe and feasible technique for experienced thoracic surgeons, which deserves support and popularity.
Keywords: Complex segmentectomy; Lower lung lobe; Multiportal VATS; Uniportal VATS.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Renji Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Prior written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of early postoperative patient-reported outcomes after multiportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;50(9):108481. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108481. Epub 2024 Jun 12. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38959845
-
[Comparison of the efficacy of robot assisted and thoracoscopic assisted thoracic surgery in non-small cell lung cancer].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Sep 3;104(34):3221-3227. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240226-00410. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 39193607 Chinese.
-
[To Explore Clinical Value of Single-port Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Elderly Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Lobectomy, Segmentectomy and Lobectomy vs Segmentectomy].Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2018 Apr 20;21(4):287-295. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.04.11. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29587908 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Today. 2023 Mar;53(3):293-305. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02442-y. Epub 2022 Jan 23. Surg Today. 2023. PMID: 35066744
-
Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for NSCLC: a meta-analysis.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Sep 9;15(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01280-2. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32907605 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer study group. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:615–22. discussion 622– 613. - PubMed
-
- Zhang Y, Jheon S, Li H, Zhang H, Xie Y, Qian B, et al. Results of low-dose computed tomography as a regular health examination among Chinese hospital employees. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160:824–e8314. - PubMed
-
- Li Y, Li X, Li H, Zhao Y, Liu Z, Sun K, et al. Genomic characterisation of pulmonary subsolid nodules: mutational landscape and radiological features. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(2):1901409. - PubMed
-
- Suzuki K, Watanabe SI, Wakabayashi M, Saji H, Aokage K, Moriya Y, et al. A single-arm study of sublobar resection for ground-glass opacity dominant peripheral lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;163(1):289–e3012. - PubMed
-
- Saji H, Okada M, Tsuboi M, Nakajima R, Suzuki K, Aokage K, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022;399:1607–17. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous