Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 20;13(1):528.
doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02848-0.

Relation among hope, self-efficacy, and psychological distress in hemodialysis patients: a path analysis

Elaheh Shourabi  1 , Seyyed Abolfazl Vagharseyyedin  2
Affiliations

Relation among hope, self-efficacy, and psychological distress in hemodialysis patients: a path analysis

Elaheh Shourabi et al. BMC Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: Psychological distress is a major problem among hemodialysis patients. Certain prior studies suggest that psychological distress is negatively associated with hope and self-efficacy. The way hope and self-efficacy are linked with psychological distress, as well as the strength of these correlations in hemodialysis patients, may vary across cultures. Also, it is unclear whether self-efficacy mediates the relationship between hope and psychological distress. The purpose of this study was to look into the effects of hope, self-efficacy, and demographic characteristics on psychological distress, as well as to verify the mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between hope and psychological distress in a sample of Iranian hemodialysis patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 2022. Total population sampling was used. The data collection tools were distributed to 345 eligible hemodialysis patients from six dialysis centers in Southern Khorasan province, Iran. Among them, 215 patients completed the questionnaires. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, the Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Efficacy instrument, the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, and the Herth Hope Index. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24 and AMOS version 22.

Results: The final predictors of psychological distress were hope (β = -0.44, P < 0.001), self-efficacy (β = -0.29, P < 0.001), and duration of hemodialysis (β = -0.15, P = 0.003). These variables collectively predicted 46% of the variance of psychological distress. Path analysis with good model fit indices indicated the significant direct effect of hope on psychological distress (ß = - 0.47, P < 0.001), the significant direct effect of self-efficacy on psychological distress (ß = - 0.29, P < 0.001), the significant direct effect of hope on self-efficacy (ß = 0.49, P < 0.001), and the significant indirect effect of hope on psychological distress (ß = - 0.19, [95% CI = -0.32, -0.08], P < 0.001).

Conclusion: It is crucial to consider hope, self-efficacy, and the duration of hemodialysis when designing interventions aimed at reducing psychological distress in hemodialysis patients. According to this study, hope has a significant influence on reducing psychological distress by enhancing self-efficacy. Therefore, implementing programs that improve hope and self-efficacy simultaneously may reduce psychological distress in hemodialysis patients.

Keywords: Hemodialysis patients; Hope; Psychological distress; Self-efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The current study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of Birjand University of Medical Sciences approved this study with the code of ethics IR.BUMS.REC.1400.214. Informed consent to participate was obtained from all the participants, and an assurance was provided regarding the confidentiality of their data. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study’s conceptual framework (1st objective)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study’s conceptual framework (2nd objective)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The final path analysis model
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, Smith M, Abdoli A, Abebe M, et al. Global, regional, and National burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jager KJ, Kovesdy C, Langham R, Rosenberg M, Jha V, Zoccali C. A single number for advocacy and communication—worldwide more than 850 million individuals have kidney diseases. Oxford University Press. 2019;1803–5. - PubMed
    1. Bakhshayeshkaram M, Roozbeh J, Heydari ST, Honarvar B, Dabbaghmanesh MH, Ghoreyshi M, et al. A population-based study on the prevalence and risk factors of chronic kidney disease in the adult population of Shiraz, Southern Iran. Galen Med J. 2019;8:e935. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almutary H, Tayyib N. Evaluating self-efficacy among patients undergoing dialysis therapy. Nurs Rep. 2021;11(1):195–201. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaboré J, Metzger M, Helmer C, Berr C, Tzourio C, Drueke TB, et al. Hypertension control, apparent treatment resistance, and outcomes in the elderly population with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Rep. 2017;2(2):180–91. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources