Machine-learning phenotyping of patients with functional mitral regurgitation undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: the MITRA-AI study
- PMID: 40395430
- PMCID: PMC12088727
- DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf006
Machine-learning phenotyping of patients with functional mitral regurgitation undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: the MITRA-AI study
Abstract
Aims: Severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) may benefit from mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER), but selection of patients remains to be optimized.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to use machine-learning (ML) approaches to uncover concealed connections between clinical, echocardiographic, and haemodynamic data associated with patients' outcomes.
Methods and results: Consecutive patients undergoing TEER from 2009 to 2020 were included in the MITRA-AI registry. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization at 1 year. External validation was performed on the Mitrascore cohort. 822 patients were included. The composite primary endpoint occurred in 250 (30%) patients. Four clusters with decreasing risk of the primary endpoint were identified (42, 37, 25, and 20% from Cluster 1 to Cluster 4, respectively). Clusters were combined into a high-risk (Clusters 1 and 2) and a low-risk phenotype (Clusters 3 and 4). High-risk phenotype patients had larger left ventriculars (LVs) (>107 mL/m2), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (<35%), and more prevalent ischaemic aetiology compared with low-risk phenotype patients. Within low-risk groups, permanent atrial fibrillation amplified that of HF hospitalizations. In the Mitrascore cohort, the incidence of the primary endpoint was 48, 52, 35, and 42% across clusters.
Conclusion: A ML analysis identified meaningful clinical phenotypic presentations in FMR undergoing TEER, with significant differences in terms of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations, confirmed in an external validation cohort.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Machine-learning; MitraClip; Mitral regurgitation; Transcatheter mitral valve repair.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: none declared.
Figures







References
-
- Asgar AW, Mack MJ, Stone GW. Secondary mitral regurgitation in heart failure: pathophysiology, prognosis, and therapeutic considerations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:1231–1248. - PubMed
-
- Mesi O, Gad MM, Crane AD, Ramchand J, Puri R, Layoun H, et al. Severe atrial functional mitral regurgitation: clinical and echocardiographic characteristics, management and outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;14:797–808. - PubMed
-
- Packer M, Grayburn PA. New evidence supporting a novel conceptual framework for distinguishing proportionate and disproportionate functional mitral regurgitation. JAMA Cardiol 2020;5:469–475. - PubMed
-
- Ooms JF, Bouwmeester S, Debonnaire P, Nasser R, Voigt J-U, Schotborgh MA, et al. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in proportionate versus disproportionate functional mitral regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2022;35:105–115.e. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous