Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 6:19:1565660.
doi: 10.3389/fncom.2025.1565660. eCollection 2025.

Computational analysis of learning in young and ageing brains

Affiliations

Computational analysis of learning in young and ageing brains

Jayani Hewavitharana et al. Front Comput Neurosci. .

Abstract

Learning and memory are fundamental processes of the brain which are essential for acquiring and storing information. However, with ageing the brain undergoes significant changes leading to age-related cognitive decline. Although there are numerous studies on computational models and approaches which aim to mimic the learning process of the brain, they often concentrate on generic neural function exhibiting the potential need for models that address age-related changes in learning. In this paper, we present a computational analysis focusing on the differences in learning between young and old brains. Using a bipartite graph as an artificial neural network to model the synaptic connections, we simulate the learning processes of young and older brains by applying distinct biologically inspired synaptic weight update rules. Our results demonstrate the quicker learning ability of young brains compared to older ones, consistent with biological observations. Our model effectively mimics the fundamental mechanisms of the brain related to the speed of learning and reveals key insights on memory consolidation.

Keywords: ageing-brains; computational-neuroscience; learning; memory; neural networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The structure of the artificial neural network represented by a bipartite graph with N vertices as input nodes, N vertices as output nodes, and N2 edges connecting each pair of input and output nodes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Young and old learning processes. (Top) One iteration of the young learning process represented using a 6-node network. The chosen output node is O1 and all its incoming edges are incremented by 0.5 of their initial weights resulting in the signal reaching the selected node being increased by 0.5 of its previous value. (Bottom) One iteration of the old learning process represented using a 6-node network. If the chosen output node is O1 and w11 is selected as the edge for the weight update, the second edge w12 is selected based on proximity from the same input node and its connection is re-wired from O2 to O1 by removing the edge and adding its weight to w11.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The graph represents the comparison of speed of the learning processes in young and old brains. The x-axis shows the number of iterations and the y-axis shows the number of patterns that completed learning at each iteration, with percentages highlighted as data tips.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The graph represents the comparison of speed of the learning in old brains with and without prior learning. The x-axis shows the number of iterations and the y-axis shows the number of patterns that completed learning at each iteration, with percentages highlighted as data tips.

Similar articles

References

    1. Aziz W., Kraev I., Mizuno K., Kirby A., Fang T., Rupawala H., et al. . (2019). Multi-input synapses, but not ltp-strengthened synapses, correlate with hippocampal memory storage in aged mice. Curr. Biol. 29, 3600–3610. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.064 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basheer I. A., Hajmeer M. (2000). Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. J. Microbiol. Methods 43, 3–31. 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00201-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bliss T. V., Collingridge G. L. (1993). A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 361, 31–39. 10.1038/361031a0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bliss T. V., Lømo T. (1973). Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J. Physiol. 232, 331–356. 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010273 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burke S. N., Barnes C. A. (2006). Neural plasticity in the ageing brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 30–40. 10.1038/nrn1809 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources