Case Report: A prenatal case with sex discordance between non-invasive prenatal testing and fetal genetic testings due to maternal rare chromosome karyotype
- PMID: 40395556
- PMCID: PMC12089056
- DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1546579
Case Report: A prenatal case with sex discordance between non-invasive prenatal testing and fetal genetic testings due to maternal rare chromosome karyotype
Abstract
Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), which made use of cell-free DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood, was currently being applied all over the world for the detection of common chromosome abnormalities. It had relatively high sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, studies demonstrated that false positive results happened in 0.3% of the cases due to several factors. These factors included confined placental mosaicism, maternal mosaicism, maternal transfusions, maternal malignancy, vanishing twins and maternal chromosomal abnormalities.
Case report: We presented a case of a 27-year-old healthy woman, who had a high risk of trisomy 21 syndrome in first-trimester serum screening at 12 gestational weeks. The result of NIPT indicated a high risk of klinefelter syndrome (47, XXY) at 15 weeks gestation. Subsequently, amniocentesis revealed a normal female fetus karyotype (46, XX) at 18 weeks gestation. Discordant sex chromosome results emerged. Eventually, it was discovered that there was a rare maternal karyotype 46,X,der(X)t (X; Y) (p22.3; q11.2), which led to the sex discrepancy between the NIPT and the fetal prenatal diagnostic results.
Conclusion: We presented a case in which there was a sex discrepancy between NIPT and fetal genetic testing due to a rare chromosome karyotype in the mother. NIPT was merely a prenatal screening test. Consequently, patients who had a screen-positive result for a chromosomal anomaly following NIPT ought to be properly counselled and advised to undergo an invasive diagnostic procedure for confirmation.
Keywords: CNV-seq; NIPT; breakpoint; case report; cffDNA.
Copyright © 2025 Zhong, Wu, Zhong, Chen, Guan, Huang and Chen.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Fetal aneuploidy screening by non-invasive prenatal testing of maternal plasma DNA sequencing with "false negative" result due to confined placental mosaicism: A case report.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 17;99(29):e20848. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020848. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32702826 Free PMC article.
-
Application of non-invasive prenatal testing in late gestation in a pregnancy associated with intrauterine growth restriction and trisomy 22 confined placental mosaicism.Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;56(5):691-693. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.09.001. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 29037560
-
Analysis of the results of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in 545 pregnant women in advanced maternal age.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Aug;27(15):7101-7106. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202308_33283. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37606120
-
[Non invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in maternal blood by parallel massive sequencing. Initial experience in Mexican women and literature review].Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2015 May;83(5):277-88. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2015. PMID: 26233973 Review. Spanish.
-
Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing of maternal plasma DNA: review of 1982 consecutive cases in a single center.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;43(3):254-64. doi: 10.1002/uog.13277. Epub 2014 Feb 10. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24339153 Review.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources