Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 6:7:1592536.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1592536. eCollection 2025.

The effect of relative pitch size on physiological, physical, technical and tactical variables in small-sided games: a literature review and practical guide

Affiliations
Review

The effect of relative pitch size on physiological, physical, technical and tactical variables in small-sided games: a literature review and practical guide

Michael C Rumpf et al. Front Sports Act Living. .

Abstract

Introduction: Manipulating relative pitch size is a common practice in soccer training; however, published evidence on its true effects for practical coaching purposes has been lacking in the scientific literature. This review aimed to identify and quantify changes in physiological, physical, technical, and tactical variables resulting from increases in relative pitch size during small-sided games (SSGs) in soccer.

Methods: A literature search was conducted, resulting in the inclusion of 56 articles in this review. Linear regression analysis was performed to examine the total and percentage changes in relative pitch size and its influence on physiological, physical, technical, and tactical variables collected during SSGs.

Results: Linear regression revealed that an increase in relative pitch size was significantly positively associated with higher values in lactate, RPE, and Edwards' TRIMP (p < 0.05). No significant associations were found for heart rate metrics or player loads. Several physical variables showed significant positive associations (total distance, relative total distance, maximum speed, number of sprints, sprinting, high-speed running, jogging, acceleration and deceleration, high-metabolic load distance, work-to-rest ratio) and negative associations (walking distance) with increases in relative pitch size (p < 0.05). Larger relative pitch sizes were associated with a lower frequency of most technical actions (ball touches, dribbles, turnovers), while tactical variables showed significant positive associations (team width, surface area, stretch index, inter-team distance) and a negative association (spatial exploration distance) with changes in pitch size.

Conclusion: Larger relative pitch sizes can be implemented as a task constraint in SSGs to enhance physiological (e.g., lactate, RPE), physical (e.g., total distance, number of sprints), and tactical variables (e.g., surface area). Caution should be exercised regarding the potential negative impact on technical outcomes when increasing relative pitch size. Practitioners in soccer can utilize the findings of this review to achieve desired effects by adjusting relative pitch size to target specific training outcomes.

Keywords: football; game formats; performance parameters; soccer; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SA was employed by TSG ResearchLab GmbH. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Traffic light plot of the risk of bias assessment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Summary plot of the risk of bias assessment.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hill-Haas SV, Dawson B, Impellizzeri FM, Coutts AJ. Physiology of small-sided games training in football: a systematic review. Sports Med. (2011) 41(3):199–220. 10.2165/11539740-000000000-00000 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clemente FM, Afonso J, Sarmento H. Small-sided games: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. PLoS One. (2021) 16(2):e0247067. 10.1371/journal.pone.0247067 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halouani J, Chtourou H, Gabbett T, Chaouachi A, Chamari K. Small-sided games in team sports training: a brief review. J Strength Cond Res. (2014) 28(12):3594–618. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000564 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clemente FM, Martins FM, Mendes RS. Developing aerobic and anaerobic fitness using small-sided soccer games: methodological proposals. Strength Cond J. (2014) 36(3):76–87. 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000063 - DOI
    1. Praca GM, Chagas MH, Bredt S, de Andrade AGP. Small-sided soccer games with larger relative areas result in higher physical and physiological responses: a systematic and meta-analytical review. J Hum Kinet. (2022) 81:163–76. 10.2478/hukin-2022-0013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources