Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 2;3(5):qxaf095.
doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf095. eCollection 2025 May.

Institutional support for navigating abortion bans in pulmonary and critical care: a multistate qualitative study

Katrina E Hauschildt  1 , Avnee J Kumar  2 , Elizabeth M Viglianti  3 , Kelly C Vranas  4 , Taylor Bernstein  1 , Leslie Moroz  5 , Theodore J Iwashyna  1   6
Affiliations

Institutional support for navigating abortion bans in pulmonary and critical care: a multistate qualitative study

Katrina E Hauschildt et al. Health Aff Sch. .

Abstract

Abortion bans enacted by numerous US states between 2022 and 2024 offered little guidance to health care systems on pragmatic implementation. Early studies identified meaningful impacts to obstetric and gynecological patients and clinicians and strategies for institutions to support clinicians in these specialties. There is widespread concern regarding the legal implications of these bans on all specialties, and the impact of institutional responses to abortion bans on clinicians outside of obstetrics and gynecology is unknown. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 29 physicians in pulmonary and/or critical care medicine-another specialty whose patients have acute, life-threatening conditions precipitated or complicated by reduced access to reproductive care-about institutional responses to abortion restrictions. Physicians reported 5 areas in which institutional responses varied: legal interpretation of bans, policy and procedural changes, communication with physicians about changes, public statements about bans, and harm-mitigation strategies. Health care organization responses to abortion bans considered most helpful shared key features, including unambiguous guidance, institutional support for physicians, and demonstrated commitment to patient-first care. Our findings suggest promising potential strategies for health care organizations to minimize impacts of abortion restrictions on clinicians and support them in providing the highest level of patient-centered care possible in the post-Dobbs era.

Keywords: abortion, legal (E04.520.050.055); critical care (N02.421.585.190); legislation as topic (N03.706.615); liability, legal (N03.706.535.547); organizational policy (I01.880.604.825.550).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: Please see ICMJE form(s) for author conflicts of interest. These have been provided as supplementary materials.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Key features of effective institutional support for physicians throughout medicine confronting abortion restrictions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Sabbath EL, McKetchnie SM, Arora KS, Buchbinder M. US obstetrician-gynecologists’ perceived impacts of post–Dobbs v Jackson state abortion bans. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(1):e2352109. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52109 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rivlin K, Bornstein M, Wascher J, Norris Turner A, Norris AH, Howard D. State abortion policy and moral distress among clinicians providing abortion after the Dobbs decision. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(8):e2426248. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26248 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nambiar A, Patel S, Santiago-Munoz P, Spong CY, Nelson DB. Maternal morbidity and fetal outcomes among pregnant women at 22 weeks’ gestation or less with complications in 2 Texas hospitals after legislation on abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(4):648–650, e1. 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.060 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Idaho Physician Well-Being Action Collaborative . A post Roe Idaho. 2024. Accessed September 6, 2024. https://issuu.com/idahocsh/docs/final_post_roe_idaho_data_report_feb._2024.
    1. Hulsman L, Bradley PK, Caldwell A, Christman M, Rusk D, Shanks A. Impact of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision on retention of Indiana medical students for residency. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023;5(11):101164. 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101164 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources