Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 20;7(3):dlaf078.
doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf078. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Pitt candidaemia score as an assessment tool for mortality in patients with candidaemia caused by Candida tropicalis and other Candida species: a multicentre study conducted in Japan

Affiliations

Pitt candidaemia score as an assessment tool for mortality in patients with candidaemia caused by Candida tropicalis and other Candida species: a multicentre study conducted in Japan

Takashi Ueda et al. JAC Antimicrob Resist. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: A bedside scoring system to assess the severity of disease is lacking for candidaemia. The Pitt candidaemia score (PCS) was evaluated for its association with mortality.

Methods: The PCS consists of five components, namely dialysis, hypotension, mechanical ventilation, cardiac arrest and mental status. Patients were classified into four categories according to their PCS. The correlation between PCS category at blood culture collection and 30 day mortality was studied individually for five Candida species.

Results: Leading rates of mortality were observed in Candida tropicalis and Candida krusei. The interval from inoculation to positive culture was 19.4 ± 9.7 h for C. tropicalis and 21.3 ± 5.6 h for C. krusei; these intervals were significantly shorter than those for other Candida species. In a Kaplan-Meier survival curve, a significant risk stratification by PCS category was demonstrated in all Candida species. A high PCS was an independent risk factor for mortality, and source control decreased the risk for C. tropicalis and Candida glabrata infections. Regarding antifungal therapy, the median PCS was 8 for liposomal amphotericin B, 2 for echinocandins and 0 for azoles, and this trend was consistent among four Candida species.

Conclusions: The mortality rate was well stratified by the PCS, and the PCS affected the selection of antifungals. A future prospective study is required for the PCS in guiding therapy for candidaemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart for patient selection. (a) Multicentre study, (b) single-centre study. aBecause of combination therapy, diagnosis of ocular disease at the time of antifungal initiation or preceding antifungal therapy within 1 month.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The 30 day and early (within 14 days) mortality rates in patients with candidaemia, as determined in a multicentre study.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The 30 day mortality rate stratified by the four categories of PCS in patients with candidaemia caused by each Candida species. The 30 day mortality rate increased incrementally with higher PCS risk categories for C. tropicalis (P < 0.001), C. glabrata (P < 0.001), C. krusei (P < 0.013), C. albicans (P = 0.004) and C. parapsilosis (P = 0.002).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Kaplan–Meier survival curve for patients with candidaemia caused by all Candida species and each Candida species individually, stratified by the PCS. PCS 0, 1 = category 1; PCS 2, 3 = category 2; PCS 4–7 = category 3; PCS ≥8 = category 4. Multicentre study: (a) C. tropicalis, (b) C. glabrata, (c) C. krusei. Single-centre study: (a) C. albicans, (b) C. parapsilosis.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Kaplan–Meier survival curve for patients with candidaemia caused by all Candida species and each Candida species individually, stratified by the PCS. PCS 0, 1 = category 1; PCS 2, 3 = category 2; PCS 4–7 = category 3; PCS ≥8 = category 4. Multicentre study: (a) C. tropicalis, (b) C. glabrata, (c) C. krusei. Single-centre study: (a) C. albicans, (b) C. parapsilosis.

References

    1. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: 309–17. 10.1086/421946 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lamagni TL, Evans BG, Shigematsu M et al. Emerging trends in the epidemiology of invasive mycoses in England and Wales (1990-9). Epidemiol Infect 2001; 126: 397–414. 10.1017/s0950268801005507 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gando S, Iba T, Eguchi Y et al. A multicenter, prospective validation of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria for critically ill patients: comparing current criteria. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 625–31. 10.1097/01.ccm.0000202209.42491.38 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andes DR, Safdar N, Baddley JW et al. Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54: 1110–22. 10.1093/cid/cis021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salmanton-García J, Cornely OA, Stemler J et al. Attributable mortality of candidemia—results from the ECMM Candida III multinational European Observational Cohort Study. J Infect 2024; 89: 106229. 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106229 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources