#misinformation: The perils of using social media for medical advice regarding infertility
- PMID: 40396592
- DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2025.2506787
#misinformation: The perils of using social media for medical advice regarding infertility
Abstract
To systematically evaluate the quality, credibility, accuracy, and readability of fertility-related content generated by users providing education, advice, and medical information on Twitter/X and Instagram. We selected Instagram and Twitter/X for data collection, as these platforms are commonly used by women of reproductive age. Using the terms 'fertility' and 'infertility', we collected posts both prospectively and retrospectively between April 21 and 28, 2024, using Keyhole and Brand Mentions. Posts were screened for eligibility, excluding non-English language posts, personal stories, advertisements, non-medical opinions, and peer-support posts. We assessed the accuracy, credibility, quality, and readability of the posts using validated instruments. Accuracy was evaluated based on current guidelines and the authors' expertise in infertility. Credibility was measured using a 10-point system that considered the source, context, currency, and editorial review. Quality was assessed using the 16-item DISCERN criteria with a five-point Likert scale. Readability was measured using the Flesch-Kincaid reading-ease test, which assigns a U.S. grade level to each post. Of the 15,214 posts identified, 939 were included in the final analysis. Fertility doctors generated 29% of the posts; others came from doctors of other specialties (11%), holistic practitioners (17%), and laypeople (39%). Seventy-four percent (74%) of posts did not cite sources or academic references, and 45% of posts contained inaccurate information. Only 11% of the posts were deemed credible. Of posts related to treatment, 19% were of high quality, while 53% of non-treatment posts met the same standard. Most posts (80%) were categorized as difficult to read based on readability scores. Only two posts (0.2%) were accurate, credible, high-quality, and easily readable. Social media posts about fertility often provide incomplete or misleading information, with a significant focus on naturopathy, dietary advice, and unproven theories about the effect of the COVID-19 vaccine on fertility. Clinicians and social media platforms must take responsibility for improving the accuracy and accessibility of health information online.
Keywords: Infertility; Instagram; fertility; misinformation; social media; twitter/X.
Similar articles
-
Misinformation and Readability of Social Media Content on Pediatric Ankyloglossia and Other Oral Ties.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Feb 1;151(2):143-150. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4211. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025. PMID: 39666364
-
The Readability of Patient-Facing Social Media Posts on Common Otolaryngologic Diagnoses.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Apr;170(4):1051-1058. doi: 10.1002/ohn.584. Epub 2023 Nov 29. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 38018504
-
COVID-19 Vaccine Information and Infertility Posts on X: Insights on a Misinformation Pandemic.Perm J. 2024 Jun 14;28(2):47-54. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.142. Epub 2024 May 3. Perm J. 2024. PMID: 38698715 Free PMC article.
-
Social Media Misinformation about Pregnancy and COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review.Med Princ Pract. 2024;33(3):232-241. doi: 10.1159/000538346. Epub 2024 Mar 14. Med Princ Pract. 2024. PMID: 38484723 Free PMC article.
-
Social media as a new source of medical information and support: analysis of scoliosis-specific information.Spine Deform. 2021 Sep;9(5):1241-1245. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00331-5. Epub 2021 Apr 7. Spine Deform. 2021. PMID: 33826124 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous